2021
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.101.2001120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligence and Learning in O-RAN for Data-Driven NextG Cellular Networks

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
59
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Differently from these papers, we analyze the performance of DRL agents with a closed loop, implementing the control actions on a software-defined testbed with an O-RAN compliant infrastructure to provide insights on how DRL agents impact a realistic cellular network environment. Finally, [6,7] consider ML/DRL applications in O-RAN, but provide a limited evaluation of the RAN performance without specific insights and results on using ML.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differently from these papers, we analyze the performance of DRL agents with a closed loop, implementing the control actions on a software-defined testbed with an O-RAN compliant infrastructure to provide insights on how DRL agents impact a realistic cellular network environment. Finally, [6,7] consider ML/DRL applications in O-RAN, but provide a limited evaluation of the RAN performance without specific insights and results on using ML.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, data-driven modeling will exploit recent developments in ML and big data to enable realtime, closed-loop, and dynamic decision-making based, for instance, on Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) [5]. These are the very same principles at the core of the Open RAN paradigm, which has recently gained traction as a practical enabler of algorithmic and hardware innovation in future cellular networks [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the use of COTS equipment from any vendor will potentially facilitate self-coordination capabilities because the network control parameters (NCPs) will be similar among various network elements. This can also reduce the parameter types to be controlled, and alleviate multi-vendor compatibility issues [12]. On the downside, different SONFs can access the same database and consequently compromise each other's security.…”
Section: B Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telecom operators will deploy open source custom solutions on a "white-box" agnostic Radio Access Network (RAN) where services, e.g., the base stations, will be instantiated on-demand [1,22]. This not only endows the network with flexibility by design, but it also allows real-time optimization of the users' service based on the current network conditions and traffic demand [16,23]. Although open-source approaches bring unprecedented performance improvements, they require a reliable development environment and at scale evaluation before they are deployed on the commercial infrastructure.…”
Section: A Cellular Networkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Origi- With its 256 SDRs and 128 remotely-accessible compute nodes and GPUs, Colosseum provides the capabilities to test full-protocol stack solutions at scale with real hardware devices and in emulated-yet realistic-environments with complex channel interactions (e.g., path loss, fading, multipath). Besides its experimentation capabilities, Colosseum can be used as an AI playground and wireless data factory to create large-scale datasets and train/test solutions in a safe and controlled environment [15,16]. We provide an overview of the architectural components and emulation capabilities of Colosseum in Sections II and III.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%