A validation study of children's dietary reporting provided an opportunity to investigate whether cognitive ability is a source of systematic error in dietary recalls. From the fall of 2004 through the spring of 2007, fourth-grade children (n ¼ 374) in Columbia, South Carolina, were observed eating school meals and interviewed to obtain 24-hour dietary recalls; subsequently, measures of dietary reporting error were calculated. The common factor extracted from 4 subject-area achievement tests (scores on which were provided by the school district for 362 children) was used as a measure of cognitive ability. For the 325 children who reported school meals that met the criteria to be reports about school meals, as cognitive ability increased, dietary reporting error decreased; the relation between cognitive ability and dietary reporting performance was stronger among girls than among boys. The mean cognitive ability for 37 children who reported no meals that satisfied the criteria for being reports about school meals was significantly lower than that for the 325 children who reported meals that satisfied these criteria. These findings indicate that cognitive ability is a source of systematic error in children's dietary recalls. More generally, the quality of epidemiologic survey data may depend systematically on the cognitive ability of respondents.bias (epidemiology); child; diet surveys; intelligence; mental recall Abbreviation: PACT, Palmetto Achievement Challenge Tests.Much of epidemiologic data consists of individuals' selfreports about past behaviors. In national health surveys, research questionnaires, and clinical assessment instruments, individuals are asked to report about such behaviors as dietary intake, physical activity, medical visits, and use of mobile telephones.Error in self-reports about these behaviors may be random or systematic. Larger random errors reduce the power of studies to detect relations between reported behaviors and outcomes (e.g., between reported intake of some food and health status); systematic errors may exaggerate or mask relations (1, 2). Systematic error may be associated with, and therefore predictable from, stable characteristics of respondents. For example, the accuracy of dietary and physical activity self-reports is related to such personality characteristics as social desirability and social approval motivation (3-5).To answer questions about past behaviors accurately, an individual must retrieve appropriate information from memory and utilize that information to formulate responses.Memory is a component of cognitive ability (6), so reporting accuracy may be related to cognitive ability, and cognitive ability may be a source of systematic error in epidemiologic data.There is little published research on the relation between cognitive ability and dietary reporting accuracy in either children or adults, and the results of extant research are mixed. Some studies of adults have examined the relation of dietary reporting accuracy to educational attainment, a rough proxy for c...