1969
DOI: 10.1525/as.1969.9.8.01p0505s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intellectuals and the National Vision: The Burmese Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Encouraged by an environment that allowed free speech and open debate, the Rangoon University Student Union, established around 1931, became central to the independence movement with a number of its leaders forming part of the first post‐independence government in 1948. With a vibrant parliamentary democracy, the university system enjoyed strong government support and flourished (Maung, 1953; Badgley, 1969; Steinberg, 2013). In the early 1960s, popular resistance to the rise of General Ne Win's socialist agendas was driven through student protests, resulting in a mass crack‐down on student activism and complete quashing of HEI independence when the military junta took control in 1962 (Thein, 2004; Saw and Arnold, 2014; Raynaud, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encouraged by an environment that allowed free speech and open debate, the Rangoon University Student Union, established around 1931, became central to the independence movement with a number of its leaders forming part of the first post‐independence government in 1948. With a vibrant parliamentary democracy, the university system enjoyed strong government support and flourished (Maung, 1953; Badgley, 1969; Steinberg, 2013). In the early 1960s, popular resistance to the rise of General Ne Win's socialist agendas was driven through student protests, resulting in a mass crack‐down on student activism and complete quashing of HEI independence when the military junta took control in 1962 (Thein, 2004; Saw and Arnold, 2014; Raynaud, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%