2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intellectual Disability and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: What Does the Clinical and Genetic Overlap Mean for Practice and Research?

Abstract: . Intellectual disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: What does the clinical and genetic overlap mean for practice and research?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, comorbidity can result in diagnostic overshadowing, whereby all clinical symptoms are attributed to a primary diagnosis rather than to additional comorbidity. This occurs particularly in cases of ID [ 37 ], and can impede diagnosis of other treatable conditions. CNV carriers are also likely to experience clinically impairing symptoms which do not fit traditional categorical diagnoses, and clinicians should consider dimensional and functional domains of impairment such as attention, social functioning, affect and executive functioning [ 38 ] rather than focussing solely on categorical diagnostic criteria.…”
Section: Clinical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, comorbidity can result in diagnostic overshadowing, whereby all clinical symptoms are attributed to a primary diagnosis rather than to additional comorbidity. This occurs particularly in cases of ID [ 37 ], and can impede diagnosis of other treatable conditions. CNV carriers are also likely to experience clinically impairing symptoms which do not fit traditional categorical diagnoses, and clinicians should consider dimensional and functional domains of impairment such as attention, social functioning, affect and executive functioning [ 38 ] rather than focussing solely on categorical diagnostic criteria.…”
Section: Clinical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, diagnostic assessment of ADHD in individuals with severe ID is particularly challenging (Thapar 2017;Oliver et al 2020). More co-ordinated research, involving larger samples and using comparable measures, is needed further to explore potential relationships between sleeping problems and behaviour in AS.…”
Section: Sdq Total Difficultiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The point prevalence of ADHD in adults in the general population has been estimated at around 2.5% (Faraone et al, 2021;Fayyad et al, 2017). The corresponding prevalence in adults with intellectual disability is generally accepted to be significantly higher (Thapar, 2017) but has been difficult to accurately define owing to differences in methodological approaches, case ascertainment, and sampling frames (Reilly & Holland, 2011). Studies have estimated that ADHD may be present in up to 20% of adults with intellectual disability (La Malfa, Lassi, Bertelli, Pallanti, & Albertini, 2008) and may be even more prevalent in people with certain genetic conditions associated with intellectual disability, including Down syndrome and Fragile X syndrome (Lo-Castro, D'Agati, & Curatolo, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%