1990
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.42.2322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrodifferential equation approach. I. Triton and α-particle binding energies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such they allow the description of the Abody wave function in terms of a single length variable, the hyper-radius ρ, and (D − 1) hyper-angular variables Ω [62,63]. Removing the center-of-mass coordinate, the A-body dynamics can be described by A − 1 Jacobi vec-…”
Section: A the Effective-interaction Hypersphericalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such they allow the description of the Abody wave function in terms of a single length variable, the hyper-radius ρ, and (D − 1) hyper-angular variables Ω [62,63]. Removing the center-of-mass coordinate, the A-body dynamics can be described by A − 1 Jacobi vec-…”
Section: A the Effective-interaction Hypersphericalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the use of more accurate nuclear wave functions is of utmost importance. Such realistic wave functions can be constructed, for instance, by means of the Integrodifferential Equation Approach (IDEA) [28,29], and are in progress. Table I.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results will be compared to several techniques: the VAR [23] and HH [24]- [27] methods, several types of approximations for the subsystem kernels of the four-body problem by operators of finite rank (SKFR) [28]- [32], the integrodifferential equation approaches SIDE [33] and IDEA [34], the CRC [35], the DFY [1,36], the FY (PW) [3], and last, but not least, 2DI [20]. Our results for the triton and α-particle binding energies are shown in tables II-V in comparison to the results of other techniques.…”
Section: A Results For N N Potential Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results will be compared to several techniques: the variational method (VAR) [23], the Hyperspherical Harmonics expansion (HH) [24][25][26][27], several types of approximations for the subsystem kernels of the four-body problem by operators of finite rank (SKFR) [28][29][30][31][32], the integrodifferential equation approaches (IDEA) and the S-wave projected integrodifferential equation (SIDE) [33,34], the Coupled-RearrangementChannel (CRC) [35], the differential Faddeev-Yakubovsky (DFY) [1,36], the FY (PW) [3], and the coupled twodimensional integral equations (2DI) [20]. Our results for the triton and α-particle binding energies are shown in Tables II-V in comparison to the results of other techniques.…”
Section: A Results For N N Potential Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%