The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.3390/su12010308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrator’s Coordination on Technological Innovation Performance in China: The Dual Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism

Abstract: As the backbone of national strategic development, Complex Product Systems (CoPS) have made great achievements in China, the world’s largest demand market and second largest economy. However, their further development is challenged by the dynamic environment, including the ongoing Sino-US trade friction, for example. The aim of this research is to investigate the influence of the dynamic external environment on CoPS innovation. Based on contingency theory, this study identifies and investigates the moderating … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(154 reference statements)
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to our expectations, the results did not support the contingent effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between IBC and innovation performance. This is not consistent with the moderating role of environmental dynamism reported in past studies (Mao et al , 2020; González-Zapatero et al , 2019), which suggest that firms become active in dynamic environments and these activities lead to enhanced performance (Boso et al , 2013). One possible explanation is that companies with high levels of IBC are proactive and future-oriented, and they invest their energy in innovative actions regardless of the turbulence in the external environment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…Contrary to our expectations, the results did not support the contingent effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between IBC and innovation performance. This is not consistent with the moderating role of environmental dynamism reported in past studies (Mao et al , 2020; González-Zapatero et al , 2019), which suggest that firms become active in dynamic environments and these activities lead to enhanced performance (Boso et al , 2013). One possible explanation is that companies with high levels of IBC are proactive and future-oriented, and they invest their energy in innovative actions regardless of the turbulence in the external environment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…The findings show that the relationship between these variables was enhanced in the turbulent environment [81]. Moreover, the findings also demonstrate that the performance of firms is greater and the level of innovation is higher where there is intense competition [82]. Firms that have a higher capability to innovate when compared to another firm's resources are more effective in responding to environmental changes and developing new capabilities [46,83].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CoPS has been considered the backbone of national strategic development (Lee and Yoon, 2015;Mao et al, 2019) and usually comprise leading-edge technologies that result from novel knowledge recombination (Davies and Brady, 2000). CoPS industries usually span different other industries and disciplinary domains (Axelson et al, 2013;Gruber et al, 2013), sometimes replacing established systems and opening new markets (O'Malley et al, 2014).…”
Section: Complex Product and Systems (Cops) In Contemporary Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%