Integrative Whole-Person Oncology Care in the UK

Abstract

The term "whole-person cancer care"-an approach that addresses the needs of the person as well as treating the disease-is more widely understood in the United Kingdom than its synonym "integrative oncology." The National Health Service (NHS) provides free access to care for all, which makes it harder to prioritize NHS funding of whole-person medicine, where interventions may be multimodal and lacking in cost-effectiveness data. Despite this, around 30% of cancer patients are known to use some form of complementary or alternative medicine (CAM). This is virtually never medically led, and usually without the support or even the knowledge of their oncology teams, with the exception of one or two large cancer centers. UK oncology services are, however, starting to be influenced from three sides; first, by well-developed and more holistic palliative care services; second, by directives from central government via the sustainable health care agenda; and third, by increasing pressure from patient-led groups and cancer charities. CAM remains unlikely to be provided through the NHS, but nutrition, physical activity, mindfulness, and stress management are already becoming a core part of the NHS "Living With and Beyond Cancer" agenda. This supports cancer survivors into stratified pathways of care, based on individual, self-reported holistic needs and risk assessments, which are shared between health care professionals and patients. Health and well-being events are being built into cancer care pathways, designed to activate patients into self-management and support positive lifestyle change. Those with greater needs can be directed toward appropriate external providers, where many examples of innovative practice exist. These changes in policy and vision for the NHS present an opportunity for integrative oncology to develop further and to reach populations who would, in many other countries, remain underserved or hard to reach by whole-person approaches.

Understanding Women’s Cardiovascular Health Using MyStrengths+MyHealth: A Patient‐Generated Data Visualization Study of Strengths, Challenges, and Needs Differences

“…A whole‐person approach recognizes several interrelated environmental, psychosocial, physiological, and health‐related behavioral factors, including a patient’s strengths (resilience), influence, overall health, and well‐being (Austin, Monsen, & Alexander, 2021; Carter, Zawalski, Sminkey, & Christopherson, 2015; Zollman, Walther, Seers, Jolliffe, & Polley, 2017). A whole‐person approach is patient centered and leverages a patient’s strengths to assist with managing multiple chronic conditions while also supporting their emotional and physical well‐being (Austin et al, 2021; Monsen, Holland, Houger‐Fung, et al, 2014; Monsen, Vanderboom, Olson, Larson, & Holland, 2017).…”

Greater Well-Being in More Physically Active Cancer Patients Who Are Enrolled in Supportive Care Services

“…Gender, fatigue, anxiety, and social support were strong correlates of QoL. Considering the continuous growth of integrative care use globally, [70][71][72][73] and especially in Canada, 74 our findings can inform health services and decision-makers how to optimize physical and functional well-being in cancer patients undergoing active treatment.…”

Are data from general practices suitable for survival analyses in the field of breast cancer? A retrospective study conducted in the United Kingdom, France and Germany

“…The management of BC survivors is multidisciplinary and involves a wide range of health professionals (e.g., physicians, nurses, psychologists). The specialist in charge of BC management can be either the oncologist or the gynecologist, depending on the country in question (5)(6)(7). Although the specific role of general practitioners (GPs) in the care of individuals with BC is not well defined, the importance of GPs has increased steadily in recent years.…”