The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management Discourse 2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39666-4_36-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrative STEM Education and Leadership for Student Success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponded with a decrease in traditional scientific equipment (Table 4) Role model interventions are wide-spread, with goals of increasing the representation of women in STEM (Casad et al, 2018). Exposure to female scientists through career talks in schools increases girls' preferences for STEM (González-Pérez et al, 2020). Science outreach often uses inschool visits (e.g.…”
Section: Shifts Away From Traditional Conceptions Of Scientistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This corresponded with a decrease in traditional scientific equipment (Table 4) Role model interventions are wide-spread, with goals of increasing the representation of women in STEM (Casad et al, 2018). Exposure to female scientists through career talks in schools increases girls' preferences for STEM (González-Pérez et al, 2020). Science outreach often uses inschool visits (e.g.…”
Section: Shifts Away From Traditional Conceptions Of Scientistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased representation of historically marginalized groups provides one avenue of meeting increased workforce needs of STEM talent. Representation and inclusion of historically marginalized individuals in the STEM workforce is a matter of equity and social justice (Briggs, 2017;Geesa et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We created several sub-indicators (also called “secondary indicators”) to explore the chosen cases. In accordance with Sections “Theoretical background” and “Key features of STEM,” and coupled with relevant studies ( Clarke, 2015 ; Jiang and Cai, 2017 ; Lin, 2017 ; National Institute of Education Sciences, 2017 ; Shaw, 2018 ; Kang, 2019 ; Office of Educational Technology, 2019 ; Durovic, 2020 ; Falloon et al, 2020 ; Geesa et al, 2021 ; Lakanukan et al, 2021 ; Sirajudin and Suratno, 2021 ), we decomposed the six primary indicators into secondary indicators as displayed in Table 3 .…”
Section: Analytical Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%