2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrative negotiation model to support water resources management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, transboundary river water allocation involves heterogeneous water demand, with different goals and interests for riparian countries under different socialecono-environmental conditions (Yazdi and Moridi 2017). Forming satisfactory and mutually agreed upon agreements allocating limited water resources to multiple stakeholders with multiple optimization goals, riparian countries must use multi-stage negotiation (Yuan et al, 2016;Medeiros et al, 2017).…”
Section: Open Access Edited Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, transboundary river water allocation involves heterogeneous water demand, with different goals and interests for riparian countries under different socialecono-environmental conditions (Yazdi and Moridi 2017). Forming satisfactory and mutually agreed upon agreements allocating limited water resources to multiple stakeholders with multiple optimization goals, riparian countries must use multi-stage negotiation (Yuan et al, 2016;Medeiros et al, 2017).…”
Section: Open Access Edited Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the presented methods above are efficient and effective for handling single-objective water allocation systems, they remain invalid for handling the coupling relationship between the tax rate and target revenue for the entire basin and provinces/regions in the river basin, which is a problem requiring equilibrium solutions for multi-objective optimal allocation (Bagatin et al 2014). In addition, previous water allocation and dispatching schemes are not based on solving the sustainability among compromise resources consumption, economic development and environmental protection of the basin, and a real-time adjustment mechanism of error correction between the predicted runoff and actual runoff is not taken into account (Medeiros et al 2017).…”
Section: Research Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estudos têm apontado que as diferença nas interações entre os grupos de partes interessadas dificultam a implementação de políticas hídricas, destacando maiores prejuízos de articulação entre os setores locais/municipais (BARBOSA; MUSHTAQ; ALAN, 2017). Isso ressalta a importância de propostas que visem facilitar não só deliberações, mas a comunicação geral entre os atores envolvidos, para que estes possam dialogar sobre suas próprias percepções e entender as diferentes percepções de outras partes interessadas de diferentes setores (MEDEIROS; URTIGA; MORAIS, 2017;AL-JAWAD et al, 2019). Na atual realidade do estudo de caso, notou-se uma maior fragilidade das prefeituras no que concerne o monitoramento do PHA Capibaribee a inter-relação com demais órgãos competentes por este acompanhamento na escala da bacia.…”
Section: Proposta De Articulação Intermunicipalunclassified