2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrative genome-scale analysis of immune infiltration in esophageal carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously reported (12)(13)(14), the expression profile of 585 immune cell infiltration related genes was used to calculate the infiltrations of the 24 immune cell populations based on the Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) method using R software (version 4.0.5). A matrix containing the infiltration enrichment scores ranging from -1 to 1 for each immune cell type in every tumor sample was obtained.…”
Section: Calculation and Clustering Of Immune Cell Infiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously reported (12)(13)(14), the expression profile of 585 immune cell infiltration related genes was used to calculate the infiltrations of the 24 immune cell populations based on the Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) method using R software (version 4.0.5). A matrix containing the infiltration enrichment scores ranging from -1 to 1 for each immune cell type in every tumor sample was obtained.…”
Section: Calculation and Clustering Of Immune Cell Infiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immune Cell Infiltration in the Two Groups. We selected the gene markers reported by Bindea et al according to the previous studies [32][33][34]. A synopsis of genes associated with microenvironment cell sets was constructed precisely, which contained 585 genes depicting 24 tumor microenvironment-(TME-) infiltration cell populations related to innate immunity and adaptive immunity.…”
Section: Differentially Expressed Genes Micrornas (Mirnas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the expression level of the common co-stimulators and immune checkpoint inhibitors ( Bian et al, 2021 ) were compared between the two groups ( Figures 3E,F ). Most of them were positively correlated ( Figure 3G ) and differentially expressed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%