2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrative Analysis of Many Weighted Co-Expression Networks Using Tensor Computation

Abstract: The rapid accumulation of biological networks poses new challenges and calls for powerful integrative analysis tools. Most existing methods capable of simultaneously analyzing a large number of networks were primarily designed for unweighted networks, and cannot easily be extended to weighted networks. However, it is known that transforming weighted into unweighted networks by dichotomizing the edges of weighted networks with a threshold generally leads to information loss. We have developed a novel, tensor-ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
137
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
137
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An edge between two nodes is present when there is at least one contact between any of the two corresponding homologous centromere copies. iii) To identify the frequently clustered centromeres, we represent the M projected networks as a third-order tensor and apply our tensor-based recurrent heavy subgraph discovery algorithm (47). We suppose that each heavy subgraph (i) should consist of ≥3 nodes, (ii) occurs in at least ≥1% of the structures in the population, and (iii) has a minimum network density 0.7. iv) Among all projected frequent centromere clusters detected in step iii we only consider those that exist in the original "unprojected" networks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An edge between two nodes is present when there is at least one contact between any of the two corresponding homologous centromere copies. iii) To identify the frequently clustered centromeres, we represent the M projected networks as a third-order tensor and apply our tensor-based recurrent heavy subgraph discovery algorithm (47). We suppose that each heavy subgraph (i) should consist of ≥3 nodes, (ii) occurs in at least ≥1% of the structures in the population, and (iii) has a minimum network density 0.7. iv) Among all projected frequent centromere clusters detected in step iii we only consider those that exist in the original "unprojected" networks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We asked whether the 23 chromosomes have different probabilities to participate in centromere clusters. To detect the frequency of clusters with distinct chromosome identities in the population, we translated each genome structure into a centromere interaction graph and applied a frequent dense-subgraph mining algorithm (47). The algorithm revealed 798 specific centromere cluster combinations (i.e., frequent cluster patterns; Materials and Methods) observed in at least 1% of the population (SI Appendix, Fig.…”
Section: Assessment Of Our Structure Population With a Diverse Collecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the current work has focussed on algorithms based on direct frequency-based subgraph mining, metric-based mining or tensor-based mining [19,77,130,131]. In fact, natural graph ensembles such as timevarying networks have received less attention in general in data mining.…”
Section: Motivation Behind This Thesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed a tensor-based computational method [20] to identify a frequent pattern in multiple weighted networks, a so-called recurrent heavy subgraph (RHS). A heavy subgraph (HS) is a subset of heavily interconnected nodes in a single network.…”
Section: Frequent Patterns In Weighted Network-tensor Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since biological modules are active across multiple conditions, we can easily filter out spurious edges by looking for patterns that appear frequently in multiple biological networks. In this article, we review algorithms for discovering several types of frequent patterns defined on multiple biological networks: coherent dense subgraphs [12], frequent dense vertex-sets [32], generic frequent subgraphs [13], differential subgraphs [21] and recurrent heavy subgraphs [20]. Although the methods described in this paper are applicable to any type of genome-wide network, we shall demonstrate our algorithms using co-expression networks due to their wide availability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%