2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrative analysis of DNA phylogeography and morphology of the European rose chafer (Cetonia aurata) to infer species taxonomy and patterns of postglacial colonisation in Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the first scenario is well supported by the wide congruence of the DNA-based species delimitation methods and by the geographical distribution of the clades, the other two scenarios (ii, iii) cannot be entirely rejected due to the absence of clear morphological characters supporting or separating the clades. The average pairwise genetic distances of Cox1 between these three clades (4–6) are well above the interspecific divergence range published for pleurostict Scarabaeoidea [ 52 , 72 – 75 ], but see [ 13 ]. The distances within subclades of clade 6 range from 1.27 to 4.12% and correspond largely with the consensually accepted sub-specific values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the first scenario is well supported by the wide congruence of the DNA-based species delimitation methods and by the geographical distribution of the clades, the other two scenarios (ii, iii) cannot be entirely rejected due to the absence of clear morphological characters supporting or separating the clades. The average pairwise genetic distances of Cox1 between these three clades (4–6) are well above the interspecific divergence range published for pleurostict Scarabaeoidea [ 52 , 72 – 75 ], but see [ 13 ]. The distances within subclades of clade 6 range from 1.27 to 4.12% and correspond largely with the consensually accepted sub-specific values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…These results were corroborated later by Zauli et al [ 76 ]. The phylogeographic analysis of the European rose chafer ( Cetonia aurata ) [ 13 ] showed incongruent results from nuclear, mitochondrial, and morphological datasets. The average pairwise genetic distance between the endemic Sicilian subspecies Cetonia aurata sicula Aliquó, 1983 and populations of Cetonia aurata pisana Heer, 1841 from the Apennine peninsula was 2.1% using the mtDNA marker Cox1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, barcoding studies of German ground beetles (Carabidae) showed intraspecific distances of up to 3.8% in the COI gene, weakly overlapping with interspecific distances which showed a minimum 3% p-distance [ 39 ]. Other Europe-wide scale studies focusing on rose beetles found intraspecific distances of up to 9% [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this evidence is not strong enough to propose specific rank for each of them. A recent study showed that the high genetic divergence of COI alone cannot be a reason for species separation in Cetonia aurata aurata (Ahrens et al 2013). There is a need for additional analyses with representative sample sizes and the use of multiple genetic loci to reconfirm our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%