1979
DOI: 10.2514/3.58576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration Time Required to Extract Accurate Data from Transonic Wind-Tunnel Tests

Abstract: Because the forces and pressures on wind-tunnel models tested at transonic speeds are not steady, even for static aerodynamic tests, integration time is required to obtain data of acceptable accuracy. The integration time required for both static and dynamic tests is evaluated analytically and confirmed by experimental measurements. It is shown that, for static and dynamic tests, the accuracy obtained is a function of integration time, frequency of the signal, and the ratio of the dynamic amplitude to the full… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The separation can be realized from the fluctuations of the high frequency response pressure transducers. Muhlstein and Coe 39 presented a method that can distinguish the difference between the pressure fluctuations due to the shock wave and that caused by the flow separation. Figure 11 schematically shows their method that distinguishes between the attached and the separated boundary layer state due to the existence of the shock wave from recording the surface pressure signature.…”
Section: Pervious Buffet Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The separation can be realized from the fluctuations of the high frequency response pressure transducers. Muhlstein and Coe 39 presented a method that can distinguish the difference between the pressure fluctuations due to the shock wave and that caused by the flow separation. Figure 11 schematically shows their method that distinguishes between the attached and the separated boundary layer state due to the existence of the shock wave from recording the surface pressure signature.…”
Section: Pervious Buffet Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 11. Schematic of pressure fluctuations for three different cases-attached flow, shock wave, and separated flow 39. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%