2017
DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2017.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration site selection by retroviruses and transposable elements in eukaryotes

Abstract: Transposable elements and retroviruses are found in most genomes, can be pathogenic and are widely used as gene-delivery and functional genomics tools. Exploring whether these genetic elements target specific genomic sites for integration and how this preference is achieved is crucial to our understanding of genome evolution, somatic genome plasticity in cancer and ageing, host-parasite interactions and genome engineering applications. High-throughput profiling of integration sites by next-generation sequencin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
232
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 210 publications
10
232
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our analysis does not rule out that LTR integration and inter-chromosomal rearrangement could co-occur in the same location without a causal relationship. Indeed, local genomic properties, such as chromatin structure are known hot spots for both transposable element integration and chromosomal breakpoints (Capilla et al 2016;Sultana et al 2017). In summary, our results detail a punctate event of chromosome reshuffling that happened in the Muridae lineage between 3 and 6 MYA and that has led to the observed karyotype of laboratory mice.…”
Section: Sequencing Assembly and Annotation Of Mus Caroli And Mus Pmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, our analysis does not rule out that LTR integration and inter-chromosomal rearrangement could co-occur in the same location without a causal relationship. Indeed, local genomic properties, such as chromatin structure are known hot spots for both transposable element integration and chromosomal breakpoints (Capilla et al 2016;Sultana et al 2017). In summary, our results detail a punctate event of chromosome reshuffling that happened in the Muridae lineage between 3 and 6 MYA and that has led to the observed karyotype of laboratory mice.…”
Section: Sequencing Assembly and Annotation Of Mus Caroli And Mus Pmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Finally, it is worth stressing that the insertion sites of TEs are usually non‐random because some specific nucleotidic sequences, chromatin and nuclear contexts may partly guide the location of their de novo integration (Sultana et al ., ). This implies that environmentally induced epigenetic modifications may promote and guide the insertion of TEs into specifically targeted genomic regions.…”
Section: All Roads Lead To Genes Via the Epigenetic Hubmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The staggered cleavage of the target DNA molecule leads to target site duplications (TSDs), which are a hallmark of DDE integration. Although the rve‐INTs of some retroviruses have a weak sequence preference for short nonpalindromic DNA motifs, target site specificity is primarily determined by the interaction between the integrase and host chromatin binding proteins . Since particular retroviral integrases interact with different host proteins, the integration patterns within mammalian genomes vary among retroviruses .…”
Section: Virophages Encode Retroviral Integrases and Tyrosine Recombimentioning
confidence: 99%