2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-017-3112-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of stress testing with graph theory to assess the resilience of urban road networks under seismic hazards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Aydin et al [2] used the GCC along with betweenness centrality and network efficiency to evaluate the topological resilience of urban road networks under seismic hazards in the Kathmandu metropolitan region, Nepal. Even though it can serve as a common measure to represent the threshold of network percolation subject to random and/or malicious attacks, in this study, we used the GCC as a metric to estimate the connectivity performance of a network.…”
Section: Determining Measures Of Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Aydin et al [2] used the GCC along with betweenness centrality and network efficiency to evaluate the topological resilience of urban road networks under seismic hazards in the Kathmandu metropolitan region, Nepal. Even though it can serve as a common measure to represent the threshold of network percolation subject to random and/or malicious attacks, in this study, we used the GCC as a metric to estimate the connectivity performance of a network.…”
Section: Determining Measures Of Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another probabilistic resilience evaluation focuses on multiple infrastructure systems and their dependencies [5]. Aydin et al [2] have previously proposed a resilience evaluation method for transportation network topology that integrates graph-based metrics into stress-testing methodologies. Ayyub [3] has provided a detailed overview of the definitions of resilience used within the context of ecology, social sciences, natural hazards etc., as well as the metrics that were available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Centrality measures We have chose node betweenness and edge betweenness centrality, which have been advocated to determine the disaster resilience of transportation networks (Aydin et al 2018). The node betweenness centrality indicates the number of shortest paths between any pair of nodes crosses a certain node and the edge betweenness centrality indicates the number of shortest paths between any pair of nodes crosses a certain edge, see Sect.…”
Section: Choice Of Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the majority of research concerning resilience of transport networks focuses on quantitative analysis; to be more specific, these quantitative studies are conducted from two perspectives: topology-based model and mathematical programming-based model [14,15]. In general, topology-based models mainly utilize some indices based on complex network theory to assess resilience, such as average path length [11], betweenness centrality [16], and giant connected component [17]. However, these topology-based measures tend to ignore the realistic characteristics of transport networks such as travel demand, road capacity, and traveller's behaviours, although such measures can be easily understood and efficiently computed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%