2018
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-2845-6.ch015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of Security in the Development Lifecycle of Dependable Automotive CPS

Abstract: The exciting new features, such as advanced driver assistance systems, fleet management systems, and autonomous driving, drive the need for built-in security solutions and architectural designs to mitigate emerging security threats. Thus, cybersecurity joins reliability and safety as a cornerstone for success in the automotive industry. As vehicle providers gear up for cybersecurity challenges, they can capitalize on experiences from many other domains, but nevertheless must face several unique challenges. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of automotive domain, existing analysis method Hazard Analysis and Risk Management (HARA), which is standardized in ISO 26262 for safety, can be extended with Threat Analysis and Risk Assessment (TARA) method, as mentioned in SAE J3061 to identify cybersecurity risks [7]. Other proposals include Failure Mode and Vulnerability Effect Analysis (FMVEA) [8] and Security Aware Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (SAHARA) [9] that aim at combining both safety and security analysis in parallel.…”
Section: Safety and Security Co-analysis And Co-engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the context of automotive domain, existing analysis method Hazard Analysis and Risk Management (HARA), which is standardized in ISO 26262 for safety, can be extended with Threat Analysis and Risk Assessment (TARA) method, as mentioned in SAE J3061 to identify cybersecurity risks [7]. Other proposals include Failure Mode and Vulnerability Effect Analysis (FMVEA) [8] and Security Aware Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (SAHARA) [9] that aim at combining both safety and security analysis in parallel.…”
Section: Safety and Security Co-analysis And Co-engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is based on the conference paper "Systematic Pattern Approach for Safety and Security Co-engineering in the Automotive Domain" from Amorim et. al [3] presented at the main track of SafeComp2017 7 in Trento/Italy. The figures in the methodology part and in the battery use case are taken from that publication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patterns are a suitable way to support argumentation that safety and security related requirements are fulfilled. They assist in reusing best practices systematically [16]. Menon et al [12] demonstrate how patterns are used to provide argumentation structures for software safety arguments.…”
Section: Fig 1 Comparison Of Safety-and Security Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To visualize these relationships between requirements and work products we use GSN. A more detailed description of the argumentation approach can be found in [16], [17].…”
Section: Fig 2 Safety and Security Co-engineering Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, it is crucial to perceive and remove those factors in the system which increase security risk. To consider safety and security together, even during the earliest stages of the design procedure, researchers have developed a new method for the automotive industry [5]. In light of the introduced development processes, the Test Field of Zalaegerszeg [6] has started a research to evaluate the required professional and scientific framework to prevent transport systems from malicious external intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%