2019
DOI: 10.21203/rs.2.17945/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of physical activity in reablement for community dwelling older adults: a systematic scoping review

Abstract: Introduction: Reablement is a rehabilitative intervention provided to homecare receivers (mostly older adults) with the aim of improving function and independence. There is limited evidence of the effectiveness of reablement and the content of these interventions is variable. Physical activity (PA) is known to be important for improving and maintaining function among older adults, but it is unclear how PA is integrated in reablement.Objective: To map existing evidence of how PA strategies are integrated and ex… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 23–28 These latter groups may have greater potential for improvement and thus may benefit more from reablement, particularly in terms of healthcare utilization and associated costs, as they generally require temporary rather than long-term support. 63 In terms of effect ¸ previous research on reablement has not yet examined sedentary behavior, 64 and uncertainty has often been reported regarding the effect on HRQoL. 18 , 19 This may be explained by the use of generic outcome measures, such as the EQ-5D, which do not account for benefits beyond health, such as well-being and independence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 23–28 These latter groups may have greater potential for improvement and thus may benefit more from reablement, particularly in terms of healthcare utilization and associated costs, as they generally require temporary rather than long-term support. 63 In terms of effect ¸ previous research on reablement has not yet examined sedentary behavior, 64 and uncertainty has often been reported regarding the effect on HRQoL. 18 , 19 This may be explained by the use of generic outcome measures, such as the EQ-5D, which do not account for benefits beyond health, such as well-being and independence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(physical) functioning, increase or maintain their independence in meaningful activities of daily living, and reduce their need for long-term services. 12 The effect of reablement interventions on sedentary behavior has not yet been investigated, 13 and research of varying methodological quality 14 has yielded inconsistent findings on other outcomes, such as daily, [15][16][17] physical, [18][19][20] and psychological functioning, 21,22 and falls. 23,24 This highlights the need for more methodologically robust trials to support or refute the effectiveness of reablement.…”
Section: Why Does This Paper Matter?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On this basis, an 'active living' policy frame emerged in the late-1990s that fore-grounded 'everyday' PA such as walking and gardening (Eyler et al, 2013). From this foundation, policy then extended into novel domains such as: mental health benefits associated with PA (Asztalos et al, 2009); contributions to environmental sustainability via 'active transportation' (Sallis et al, 2004); and interventions across the whole lifecycle, particularly the '(re)enablement' of older people (Mjøsund et al, 2020). This plurality became rooted in global PA policy (WHO, 2018), expressed as a 'whole systems' approach (Rutter et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Emergence Of Physical Activity Policy and Associated Expressions Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%