SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1999 1999
DOI: 10.1190/1.1820762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of OBS data and surface data for OBS multiple removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RM map of Bingham & Shakeshaft shows a circular structure of about the size of their beam (∼ 2 • ) where RM ≈ −5 rad m −2 , in a region where RM s are −1 rad m −2 < ∼ RM < ∼ 0 rad m −2 . Verschuur (1968) reobserved this region at higher angular resolution (∼ 40 ′ ) with the 250ft MkI telescope at Jodrell Bank at 408 MHz. Verschuur found that it is a ring-like structure of low polarized intensity (50% less than in its surroundings) with a radius of a few degrees, and with a small region (about one beam) of almost zero polarization at the southwestern edge of the ring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The RM map of Bingham & Shakeshaft shows a circular structure of about the size of their beam (∼ 2 • ) where RM ≈ −5 rad m −2 , in a region where RM s are −1 rad m −2 < ∼ RM < ∼ 0 rad m −2 . Verschuur (1968) reobserved this region at higher angular resolution (∼ 40 ′ ) with the 250ft MkI telescope at Jodrell Bank at 408 MHz. Verschuur found that it is a ring-like structure of low polarized intensity (50% less than in its surroundings) with a radius of a few degrees, and with a small region (about one beam) of almost zero polarization at the southwestern edge of the ring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…After deghosting, regularization and interpolation, the next step is to predict the multiple models, which we do for SRME and MWD individually. With the regularized/interpolated streamer data, , and OBN data, , we obtain the SRME model ( Figure 1a) as follows (Ikelle, 1999;Verschuur and Neumann, 1999):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it requires significant modifications to work with OBN data due to the sparse sampling of the receivers (nodes) and the significant datum difference between sources and receivers. To address such issues, a modified SRME scheme was proposed by Ikelle (1999) and Verschuur and Neumann (1999), in which OBN and streamer data were combined to predict surface-related multiples for OBN data (Zhong et al, 2014). Like surfacestreamer SRME, the OBN SRME also suffers from limited offset and azimuth coverage of streamer data and limited bandwidth due to an extra source wavelet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction of multiples on sea-bed data by combining streamer and sea-bed data using the SRME method was introduced by Verschuur and Neumann (1999) and applied to well-sampled 2D acquisition geometries. Zhong et al (2014) applied this method to a 3D OBN survey in deep water Gulf of Mexico, combining data from individual OBN nodes with streamer data from a wideazimuth (WAZ) survey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%