2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2003.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of nonlinearity-management and dispersion-management for pulses in fiber-optic links

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, it is easy to see that the optimal pre-compensation length for the best system configuration (η 1 = 0.6, η 2 = 1, and L = 50 km) is approximately equal to 3.8 km, instead of the 2.2 km that would have been predicted by (2) . Note that Killey et al's method for calculating the pre-compensation length in lumped amplification systems is obtained under the assumption that nonlinearities are accumulated in the transmission span only, and not in the DCF.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Pre-compensation Lengthmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4, it is easy to see that the optimal pre-compensation length for the best system configuration (η 1 = 0.6, η 2 = 1, and L = 50 km) is approximately equal to 3.8 km, instead of the 2.2 km that would have been predicted by (2) . Note that Killey et al's method for calculating the pre-compensation length in lumped amplification systems is obtained under the assumption that nonlinearities are accumulated in the transmission span only, and not in the DCF.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Pre-compensation Lengthmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Indeed, the possibility of exerting control over the signal power profile and perform direct nonlinearity management [1][2][3][4] allows for the balancing of the penalties originated from noise accumulation and from nonlinear impairments, thus leading to increased system reach or expanded performance margins [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting the differences in parameter c for both cases. For ǫ < 0, positive c in the fitting set (10) means that, even for a strong perturbation, a final waiting time is required to observe the splitting of the 2-soliton, which is another manifestation of its stabilization by the quintic self-focusing term. On the contrary, for ǫ > 0, the best fit actually required to choose c < 0-in the parameter region where formula (8) with c < 0 produces T > 0.…”
Section: B Resonant Splitting Of the Second-order Solitonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7,8,9], and the integration of the NLM with the DM was considered in Ref. [10]. In terms of Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) in dilute atomic gases, which, in the mean-field approximation, is also described by the NLSE (called the Gross-Pitaevskii equation, in that context [11]), the NLM represents the application of the Feshbach-resonance technique to the BEC in the case when the resonance is induced by a variable (ac) magnetic field [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility is to consider periodic mismatch management, which corresponds to the situation with the QPM is implemented in the form of a superlattice, rather than a simple periodic lattice [26]. It is also relevant to mention theoretically investigated tandem systems, that offer a possibility to minimize the mismatch in a waveguide built as a periodic concatenation of linear and v ð2Þ -nonlinear segments, in the temporal [27,28] and spatiotemporal [29] domains alike (a v ð3Þ -counterpart of the tandems is represented by split-step systems [31][32][33][34]). The self-trapping of light in walkoff-compensating tandem structures was demonstrated experimentally in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%