Oceans '99. MTS/IEEE. Riding the Crest Into the 21st Century. Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.9
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.1999.800148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of multibeam bathymetry and sidescan sonar data for geological surveys

Abstract: I. ABSTRACTA geophysical survey conducted off Liverpool, Nova Scotia, Canada in November 1998 collected data using multibeam bathymetric, sidescan sonar, high-resolution subbottom profiler, and acoustic seafloor classification systems. During the survey, multibeam bathymetric and sidescan sonar data were processed on-site and imported into a Geographical Information System for further analysis and display. Shaded relief images derived from the multibeam bathymetric data and sidescan sonar mosaics were combined… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this constraint, various techniques are employed to successfully complete a survey of an area of interest with multiple acoustic sensors; the mobilization of separate surveys for each interfering sensor [11], [26], separation of the instruments' operating frequency sufficiently far that they were undetectable from one another [5], [6], and trigger synchronization [1], [2], [27].…”
Section: Cross-sensor Acoustic Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this constraint, various techniques are employed to successfully complete a survey of an area of interest with multiple acoustic sensors; the mobilization of separate surveys for each interfering sensor [11], [26], separation of the instruments' operating frequency sufficiently far that they were undetectable from one another [5], [6], and trigger synchronization [1], [2], [27].…”
Section: Cross-sensor Acoustic Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, compromises were sought to avoid sensor crosstalk by mobilising separate surveys for each of the interfering sensors 15,16 or by separating the operating frequency of the sonar sufficiently far that they are undetectable from one another. 11,17 Temporally separating the transmission-reception cycles of similar frequency sonar provides a more advanced method of crosstalk avoidance.…”
Section: Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the provision, and combined analysis, of complementary and comparative datasets affords a more accurate representation of the seafloor, the removal of possible dataset ambiguities and improved data analysis and interpretation (Wright et al, 1996;Evans et al, 1999;Hughes Clarke et al, 1999;Dasarathy, 2000;Fanlin et al, 2003;Duxfield et al, 2004;Nitsche et al, 2004;Shono et al, 2004). Data fusion is the process of taking information from multiple, independent datasets and combining it to extract information not available in single datasets; the combined analysis of contoured bathymetry maps, generated from multibeam echosounders, and the sidescan sonar acoustic reflectivity images permit the geologic interpretation of multibeam bathymetry data to be enhanced by providing an acoustic characterisation of the seafloor from which geologic composition can be inferred, while the bathymetric information improves the representation of the seafloor relief in sidescan imagery by providing the geometric configuration of the seabed (de Moustier et al, 1990;Pouliquen et al, 1999). An integrated interpretation of acoustic datasets is presented by Nitsche et al (Nitsche et al, 2004).…”
Section: Sensor Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have also attempted to avoid cross-sensor acoustic contamination by separating the operating frequency of the payload sonar sufficiently far that they are undetectable from one another (Pouliquen et al, 1999;Lurton & Le Gac, 2004). As a result, the sonar systems employed are a combination of high-frequency and low-frequency sonar.…”
Section: Acoustic Interference Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%