2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of MODIS data into a simple model for the spatial distributed simulation of soil water content and evapotranspiration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
15

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
38
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…As suggested there, there is a need to redefine the limits of the plant available water used in the calculation, which in turn depends on the field capacity and the wilting point. However, the RMSE obtained here, ranging between 0.011 and 0.149 m 3 m -3 , is in line with similar works (Diekküger et al, 1995;Vanclooster & Boesten, 2000;Jalota & Arora, 2002;Zhang & Wegehenkel, 2006), and with remotely sensed estimations of soil moisture, such as SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity from the European Space Agency) and SMAP (Soil Moisture Active-Passive from NASA), targeted in an RMSE of 0.04 m 3 m -3 . It is necessary to note the higher RMSE values in the case of the three forest-pasture stations at surface layer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As suggested there, there is a need to redefine the limits of the plant available water used in the calculation, which in turn depends on the field capacity and the wilting point. However, the RMSE obtained here, ranging between 0.011 and 0.149 m 3 m -3 , is in line with similar works (Diekküger et al, 1995;Vanclooster & Boesten, 2000;Jalota & Arora, 2002;Zhang & Wegehenkel, 2006), and with remotely sensed estimations of soil moisture, such as SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity from the European Space Agency) and SMAP (Soil Moisture Active-Passive from NASA), targeted in an RMSE of 0.04 m 3 m -3 . It is necessary to note the higher RMSE values in the case of the three forest-pasture stations at surface layer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…López- Urrea et al, 2009;Campos et al, 2010;Liu & Luo, 2010; and spatially distributed (Zhang & Wegehenkel, 2006;Er-Raki et al, 2010;Sánchez et al, 2010). The use of a linear relationship of NDVI-K cb (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index-basal crop coefficient) instead of the tabulated values of K cb improves the accuracy of the results, even over woody crops, as shown in Campos et al (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5, separating variables, and integrating Eq. 5, we obtain the volumetric soil water content of a single layer after percolation (Zhang and Wegehenkel, 2006):…”
Section: Percolation Submodelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to recent literature, irrigation water management is more and more considering remotely sensed data, partly in combination with model approaches, in order to obtain spatial information (e.g., Guermazi et al, 2016;Toureiro et al, 2016). Data of lysimeters and soil water sensors are typically used to calibrate and validate such combined approaches (e.g., Zhang and Wegehenkel, 2006). Disregarding these novel developments, lysimeter data are traditionally used to develop, calibrate, and validate models to better understand the basic hydrological processes and make them applicable at a larger scale.…”
Section: Quantifying Soil Water Balance Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%