2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of micro-filtration into osmotic membrane bioreactors to prevent salinity build-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And then, the water flux of the fouled FO membrane after backwashing was also tested. According to Achilli et al (2009) and Wang et al (2014aWang et al ( , 2014b, the difference between the initial flux of new membrane and the flux of fouled membrane before backwashing could be used to characterize the flux decline due to the membrane fouling only, while the flux decline calculated by the drop from the initial flux to the flux after backwashing could be attributed to the irreversible membrane fouling.…”
Section: Offline Batch Experiments For Water Flux Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And then, the water flux of the fouled FO membrane after backwashing was also tested. According to Achilli et al (2009) and Wang et al (2014aWang et al ( , 2014b, the difference between the initial flux of new membrane and the flux of fouled membrane before backwashing could be used to characterize the flux decline due to the membrane fouling only, while the flux decline calculated by the drop from the initial flux to the flux after backwashing could be attributed to the irreversible membrane fouling.…”
Section: Offline Batch Experiments For Water Flux Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of cleaning process was examined by measuring the water flux after cleaning. The water flux recovery was 95.5%, 95.0% and 97.2% for SOA, KH 2 PO 4 and MAP, respectively, as shown in Figure 4a, indicating high fouling reversibility of FO [39]. Figure 4b suggests that no severe fouling occurred during four days of operation of MF-FDFO-MBR study, highlighting the low (or reversible) fouling potential of FO membrane and the effectiveness of aeration on controlling membrane fouling.…”
Section: Effect Of Different Types Of Fertilizersmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The total TOC removal efficiency of the system could be obtained according to the mass balance of TOC concentration [39]:…”
Section: Toc Removal Efficiency and Mitigating Salt Accumulation By Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water flux is a key performance parameter for FO and it decreases with FO operation because of the decreased osmotic pressure due to draw solution dilution/feed solution concentration and reverse salt flux [66]. This is especially important to wastewater treatment when FO is applied in the form of osmotic membrane bioreactor (OsMBR) [67,68], as decreased water flux lowers the treatment capacity and increased salt concentration in wastewater inhibits biodegradation [32,47,48]. To alleviate the salt effects on wastewater treatment and maintain a low salinity in wastewater, an MDC can be linked to an OsMBR as a desalination unit.…”
Section: Providing Suitable Draw Solutementioning
confidence: 99%