2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22989-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of machine learning and genome-scale metabolic modeling identifies multi-omics biomarkers for radiation resistance

Abstract: Resistance to ionizing radiation, a first-line therapy for many cancers, is a major clinical challenge. Personalized prediction of tumor radiosensitivity is not currently implemented clinically due to insufficient accuracy of existing machine learning classifiers. Despite the acknowledged role of tumor metabolism in radiation response, metabolomics data is rarely collected in large multi-omics initiatives such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and consequently omitted from algorithm development. In this study,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most of the reviewed studies, the different omics datasets were separately analyzed and only combined for the final interpretation of the metabolic changes. In this scenario, the development and implementation of novel computational tools, focused on the integrated analysis of different omics datasets that enable the assessment of the interplay between the different components of a biological system, would be greatly valuable [162,163]. Furthermore, although some studies included a vast number of samples [61,63,101,107,109], a major limitation in the majority of these studies was the lack of an external cohort of PCa patients/samples for confirming the reproducibility and robustness of the results.…”
Section: Future Perspectives and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the reviewed studies, the different omics datasets were separately analyzed and only combined for the final interpretation of the metabolic changes. In this scenario, the development and implementation of novel computational tools, focused on the integrated analysis of different omics datasets that enable the assessment of the interplay between the different components of a biological system, would be greatly valuable [162,163]. Furthermore, although some studies included a vast number of samples [61,63,101,107,109], a major limitation in the majority of these studies was the lack of an external cohort of PCa patients/samples for confirming the reproducibility and robustness of the results.…”
Section: Future Perspectives and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, GCNs of 17 human cancers and 46 human tissues have been generated and used to gain insights into disease mechanisms by identifying the key biological components of the cancers or tissues ( Arif et al., 2021 ; Lee et al., 2018 ; Uhlen et al., 2017 ). GEMs are reconstructed by incorporating all biochemical reactions and transport processes in a cell or tissue and have been extensively used to discover potential biomarkers and drug targets, as well as to reveal the mode of action of a drug ( Lewis and Kemp, 2021 ; Mardinoglu et al., 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of this study, the high accuracy (AUC about 0.906 ± 0.004) was reported in the model used to integrate data from different omics fields. In addition, this method played an important role in identifying subgroups of patients as well as metabolic biomarkers in resistance to ionizing radiation (Lewis and Kemp, 2021).…”
Section: In Multi-omics Data Analyses Of Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%