Integration of High Resolution Geoelectrical Resistivity and Refraction Seismic Profiling for Exploration of Groundwater

Lee, S.C.H.; Rafek, Abdul Ghani; Zakariah, Muhammad Noor Amin

doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201800399

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…From the pro le, ρ A were digitized for every 5 m depth below the MT station. The interval used is the most suitable for this study as bigger intervals tend to miss important details due to low resolution (Lee et al, 2018;Yang et al, 2015).…”

Section: Apparent Resistivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Novel approach in static shift correction for magnetotellurics data using 2D electrical resistivity imaging

Rahman,

muztaza,

Rosli

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Magnetotellurics (MT) method utilizes lightning activities and solar wind interactions as electromagnetic sources in measuring resistivity distribution to great depths. Static shift is a common problem in MT where actual MT data is shifted higher or lower in logarithmic scale but maintains the same apparent resistivity (ρA) curve. Currently, MT static shift is corrected using vertical electrical sounding (VES) and transient electromagnetic (TEM) data, which give ρA data in 1D that does not depicts subsurface materials precisely. In contrast, 2D electrical resistivity imaging (2D ERI) provides data in lateral and vertical directions; therefore, better images the ground with higher sensitivity to inhomogeneity. Additionally, true resistivity (ρT) obtained after inversion provides a better representation of the Earth than ρA. Therefore, this study develops a new static shift correction using 2D ERI ρT data. 2D ERI lines were conducted across MT stations to obtain the best resistivity model and extract ρA and ρT values beneath MT stations as two data groups for static shift correction. Resistivity data from 2D ERI was employed to constrained MT phase inversion to obtain the actual MT response for every MT station. Resistivity curve from MT survey was then shifted to the actual response to achieve its true resistivity level. The results obtained from ρA and ρT shifts yielded RMS values of < 11.3 and < 6.9 respectively. The lower RMS values indicates that the ρT shifts is more effective in removing static shift effect. Qualitatively, model without static shift correction yielded illogical resistivity values while the other models were acceptable. This showcases that the performance of novel MT static shift correction using ρT surpasses conventional method and is reliable for future usage.

show abstract

Section: Apparent Resistivitymentioning

confidence: 99%