1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(97)90194-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of hamstring tendon graft with bone in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
108
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
108
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Experimental and clinical studies support the fast healing of tendon-to-bone fixation using interference screws. 23,24 In conventional single-bundle PCL reconstruction, it is recommended that femoral graft fixation be placed in the so-called most isometric point. [25][26][27] However, the normal PCL consists of a posteromedial bundle that is tight in extension, and a stronger anterolateral bundle that is mostly taught in flexion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Experimental and clinical studies support the fast healing of tendon-to-bone fixation using interference screws. 23,24 In conventional single-bundle PCL reconstruction, it is recommended that femoral graft fixation be placed in the so-called most isometric point. [25][26][27] However, the normal PCL consists of a posteromedial bundle that is tight in extension, and a stronger anterolateral bundle that is mostly taught in flexion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no analogous sites in humans where a native tendon passes through a bone tunnel, however, and the biology of this unique environment remains incompletely understood. Wide variations in the morphological characteristics of the tendon-bone attachment site have been reported [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Some studies have demonstrated formation of a native, direct type of insertion and an intermediate fibrocartilage zone at the interface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases using cross-pins, as the cortical-cancellous suspensory devices, excellent strength and stiffness have been reported [8]; nonetheless, it has the shortcomings of bungee effects and slippage within cancellous bones [14]. Interference screws, as the compression fixation devices, could be fixed close to the normal ACL attachment site [22], and additional incisions are not required. In cases when bioabsorbable screws are used, it has an advantage that it does not distort the results of magnetic resonance imaging; however, in comparison with cases using the BPTB, it showed remarkably low strength and stiffness [2] and it may induce an inflammatory reaction [5,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%