2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0128-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of GIS and remote sensing for estimation of soil loss and prioritization of critical sub-catchments: a case study of Tapacurá catchment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
12

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…It is an important factor to evaluate the ability of vegetation canopy and ground covers to resist soil erosion, and its value is between 0 and 1. Using remote sensing image interpretation to acquire land cover type maps [70] or collecting land use data [67,71] directly and then assigning C values from the existing literature to the corresponding land use/land cover types is the main means of accessing C factors on the river basin and regional scale [72]. This paper assigned C values to different LULC classes derived from GCM (Table 1) according to existing research in the black soil region [9,13,16].…”
Section: Cover Management Factor (C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an important factor to evaluate the ability of vegetation canopy and ground covers to resist soil erosion, and its value is between 0 and 1. Using remote sensing image interpretation to acquire land cover type maps [70] or collecting land use data [67,71] directly and then assigning C values from the existing literature to the corresponding land use/land cover types is the main means of accessing C factors on the river basin and regional scale [72]. This paper assigned C values to different LULC classes derived from GCM (Table 1) according to existing research in the black soil region [9,13,16].…”
Section: Cover Management Factor (C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As monitoring soil management and conservational practices are difficult to achieve via satellite imaging, since they represent a small portion of the basin, this variable was considered to be 1. It must be highlighted that this same thought was used in various works, such as those of Pradhan et al (2012), Vemu andPinnamaneni (2011), Silva, Montenegro andSantos (2012), Oliveira et al (2014) and Durães, Mello and Beskow (2016). The values of C used in this study were obtained from the literature presented in Table 4.…”
Section: Application Of the Rusle To The Uirbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As most of the watershed shows no erosion control practices, the P factor was considered to be equal to 1 as suggested by Beskow, Norton, (2009), Ozsoy et al (2012) and Silva, Montenegro and Santos (2012). Figure 2 shows the basic maps (DEM, slope, soil type and soil use ) to obtain maps of the R, K, LS and CP factors.…”
Section: Rainfall Erosivity (R)mentioning
confidence: 99%