1988
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.62.12.4752-4755.1988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of Friend murine leukemia virus into both alleles of the p53 oncogene in an erythroleukemic cell line

Abstract: The Friend virus-transformed erythroleukemic cell line DP16-9B4 has undergone a complex rearrangement of the p53 oncogene and lacks any detectable expression of the p53 protein. We report here characterization of both p53 alleles in this cell line and identify independent integrations of Friend murine leukemia virus sequences into the coding region of both alleles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another tumor suppresser gene, p53, has also been shown to be inactivated by virus integration in Friend murine leukemia virus-induced erythroleukemias (8,24). As with Nf1, inactivation of the second p53 allele can occur by a nonviral mechanism or by integration of a second provirus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another tumor suppresser gene, p53, has also been shown to be inactivated by virus integration in Friend murine leukemia virus-induced erythroleukemias (8,24). As with Nf1, inactivation of the second p53 allele can occur by a nonviral mechanism or by integration of a second provirus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, occupation of both alleles of a single gene has never been observed when transcriptional activation is the relevant mechanism. In contrast, insertion at both alleles could occur when the selective advantage is loss of function, as for Friend MuLV insertions at both alleles of the p53 gene (13,32). However, such considerations would not apply to pim-1, which is an activation target (50), and the lack of any instance in our tumor series in which insertions have occurred at both of thefit-1 andpim-1 alleles also argues against such an interpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The genomes of mouse erythroleukaemia cell lines are often associated with the disruption of the ets genes, spi‐1 (PU.1) ( Moreau‐Gachelin et al , 1988 ; Klemsz et al , 1990 ) and fli‐1 ( Ben‐David et al , 1990 , 1991; Sels et al , 1992 ) as well as commonly showing mutations of the tumour suppressor gene, p53 ( Mowat et al , 1985 ; Rovinski et al , 1987 ; Hicks & Mowat, 1988; Ben‐David & Bernstein, 1991; Lu et al , 1994 ) or the fli‐2 locus ( Lu et al , 1994 ). No rearrangements were noted in either the fli‐1 or fli‐2 loci in Bb1 and Bb1‐3, but gross rearrangements were obvious at the p53 (Fig 2A) and spi‐1 (Fig 2B) loci.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%