2020
DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2020.1740669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of engineering into K-12 education: a systematic review of teacher professional development programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both studies were set in the context of STEM education, and the integrated use of technology is limited to single-subject content learning. As for the teacher use of ICT in engineering, very little is known, except that teachers' lack of engineering knowledge is an identified barrier for the implementation of STEM education [34][35][36]. Nonetheless, quantitative studies of teachers' technological pedagogical science, mathematics, and engineering knowledge influencing their interdisciplinary STEM efficacies have been recently reported [31,37].…”
Section: Learning By Designing To Develop Teachers' Tpackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both studies were set in the context of STEM education, and the integrated use of technology is limited to single-subject content learning. As for the teacher use of ICT in engineering, very little is known, except that teachers' lack of engineering knowledge is an identified barrier for the implementation of STEM education [34][35][36]. Nonetheless, quantitative studies of teachers' technological pedagogical science, mathematics, and engineering knowledge influencing their interdisciplinary STEM efficacies have been recently reported [31,37].…”
Section: Learning By Designing To Develop Teachers' Tpackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of such offerings has been shown to positively influence teacher self-efficacy toward pedagogical content knowledge, engagement, and disciplinary knowledge [47], [54], [55]. Key to the effectiveness of engineering PL experiences is structure [56], hands-on, real-world experiences [57], and opportunities to collaborate [58]. A challenge associated with any such PL experience is the applicability of the training provided for teaching engineering at different levels and using different program resources.…”
Section: B Engineering Teacher Professional Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, numerous studies support the use of engineering-focused professional development to enhance teachers' engineering content knowledge and understanding of engineering design (Duncan et al, 2011;Guzey et al, 2014;Utley et al, 2019;Yoon et al, 2013). Mesutoglu and Baran (2021) suggest several research-based guidelines for the design of effective engineering professional development to include: (1) use a variety of instructional methods such as presentations, panels, field trips, and hands-on activities; (2) provide teachers opportunities to work collaboratively with other teachers, engineers, and researchers; and (3) provide ongoing constructive feedback. The design of such research-based engineering professional development efforts can be facilitated through The National Science Foundation's (NSF) Research Experience for Teachers (RET) program (National Science Foundation, 2023).…”
Section: Current State Of Engineering Education In Elementarymentioning
confidence: 99%