2019
DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of eDNA‐Based Biological Monitoring within the U.S. Geological Survey’s National Streamgage Network

Abstract: This study explores the feasibility and utility of integrating environmental DNA (eDNA) assessments of species occurrences into the United States (U.S.) Geological Survey’s national streamgage network. We used an existing network of five gages in southwest Idaho to explore the type of information that could be gained as well as the associated costs and limitations. Hydrologic technicians were trained in eDNA sampling protocols and they collected samples during routine monthly visits to streamgages over an enti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the detection of fish species, eDNA-based monitoring outperforms traditional methods such as electrofishing: for example, for the detection of the endangered European weather loach, Misgurnus fossilis (Sigsgaard et al, 2015), the assessment of fish communities in Australian streams (McColl-Gausden et al, 2020), and the distribution of brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis in a US watershed (Evans et al, 2017). The manifold successes of eDNA-based species detection lead to a call for more standardization and better reporting practices (Goldberg et al, 2016;Minamoto et al, 2020;Thalinger et al, 2021a) and to an international effort for implementing the technology into routine species monitoring (Leese et al, 2016;Pilliod et al, 2019). Although reporting the presence/absence of particular species is the starting point of these endeavors, a more quantitative interpretation of field-derived eDNA data is key for the general application of this technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the detection of fish species, eDNA-based monitoring outperforms traditional methods such as electrofishing: for example, for the detection of the endangered European weather loach, Misgurnus fossilis (Sigsgaard et al, 2015), the assessment of fish communities in Australian streams (McColl-Gausden et al, 2020), and the distribution of brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis in a US watershed (Evans et al, 2017). The manifold successes of eDNA-based species detection lead to a call for more standardization and better reporting practices (Goldberg et al, 2016;Minamoto et al, 2020;Thalinger et al, 2021a) and to an international effort for implementing the technology into routine species monitoring (Leese et al, 2016;Pilliod et al, 2019). Although reporting the presence/absence of particular species is the starting point of these endeavors, a more quantitative interpretation of field-derived eDNA data is key for the general application of this technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the detection of fish species, eDNA-based monitoring outperforms traditional methods such as electrofishing: for example, for the detection of the endangered European weather loach, Misgurnus fossilis (Sigsgaard et al, 2015), the assessment of fish communities in Australian streams (McColl‐Gausden et al, 2020), and the distribution of brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis in a US watershed (Evans et al, 2017). The manifold successes of eDNA-based species detection lead to a call for more standardization and better reporting practices (Goldberg et al, 2016; Minamoto et al, 2020; Thalinger et al, 2020a) and to an international effort for implementing the technology into routine species monitoring (Leese et al, 2016; Pilliod et al, 2019). Although reporting the presence/absence of particular species is the starting point of these endeavors, a more quantitative interpretation of field-derived eDNA data is key for the broader applicability of this technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, we hope to add a coherent dynamic modelling framework that accommodates longitudinal eDNA surveys. Continued research into dynamic multi‐scale occupancy models is essential as longitudinal eDNA monitoring programs gain popularity (Bálint et al., 2018; Hutchins, Sepulveda, Hopper, & Staigmiller, 2019; Pilliod, Laramie, MacCoy, & Maclean, 2019; Uchii, Doi, Yamanaka, & Minamoto, 2017). Once these methods have been developed, we intend to add them to msocc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%