2011
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2010.0743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of clustering analysis and reward/penalty mechanisms for regulating service reliability in distribution systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has been proved in theory and practice that service reliability would be deteriorated under PBR [5], [13]. Therefore, regulators apply some tools to prevent such an outcome.…”
Section: Reward-penalty Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, it has been proved in theory and practice that service reliability would be deteriorated under PBR [5], [13]. Therefore, regulators apply some tools to prevent such an outcome.…”
Section: Reward-penalty Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it will be penalized if cannot satisfy the desired reliability level [2]- [4]. The regulator determines target value of the RPS using either its historic reliability data [3], or based on historical reliability data of all similar companies [5], [6]. The latter method, which is based on the yardstick regulation concept, can effectively create competition between DisCos aimed to improve reliability [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This methodology was then employed in designing the procedure of some fair RPSs. In [11] and [12], fuzzy C-means clustering was borrowed to effectively categorize similar DISCOs, and the RPSs were designed for each cluster to improve service reliability. In [13], the RPS was designed using data envelopment analysis (DEA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%