Integration of BIM and design for deconstruction to improve circular economy of buildings

Lima, Patricia Rodrigues Balbio de; Rodrigues, Conrado de Souza; Post, Jouke M.

doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108015

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most practices are relatively new, with countable examples of best practices, and there has not yet been sufficient time to prove their efficiency and effectiveness in the long term. In contrast, the study by De Lima et al [36] reported a prevailing number of positive sentiments, followed by neutral sentiments, while negative sentiments were minimal. However, Cody et al [37] claim that there is a larger number of negative sentiments in tweets containing the word "climate" due to the frequent use of this term in the context of natural disasters, bills, etc.…”

Section: Sentiment Analysis For Countriesmentioning

confidence: 76%

“…Most practices are relatively new, with countable examples of best practices, and there has not yet been sufficient time to prove their efficiency and effectiveness in the long term. In contrast, the study by De Lima et al [36] reported a • Topic 0-Barriers-The scope of this topic delves into the examination of 'barriers', encompassing the study of difficulties that impede progress towards the realisation of CE. The findings underscore the recognition by stakeholders of the challenges that arise when transitioning from a linear to a circular model.…”

Section: Sentiment Analysis For Countriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The first branch is concerned with new construction projects and emphasises the importance of making the right choices and using proper materials, design principles, and tools to achieve high circularity. This division is based on the idea that the design stage is the most critical phase in the lifecycle of a building and that the right decisions and actions taken at this stage can significantly influence the circularity of the building [36,48]. The second branch of literature deals with the renovation of ageing buildings and the demolition of buildings, highlighting end-of-life stage strategies as crucial.…”

Section: Stakeholders' Opinions On Ce Implication For Life Cycle Stagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Cultivating Sustainable Construction: Stakeholder Insights Driving Circular Economy Innovation for Inclusive Resource Equity

Karaca,

Tleuken,

Pineda-Martos

et al. 2024

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to its intricate production processes, complex supply chains, and industry-specific characteristics, the construction industry faces unique challenges in adopting circular economy (CE) principles that promote resource equity. To address this issue, this study aims to delve into identifying stakeholders’ opinions and perceptions regarding key CE strategies across different stages of the building life cycle (BLC). Both European and non-European stakeholders within the “CircularB” COST Action network and beyond participated in this research. Three methods were employed to assess stakeholders’ opinions: an online survey, a structured survey with a semi-guided workshop, and creative thinking round table discussions. Natural language processing (NLP), specifically topic modelling and sentiment analysis, was used to analyse the data collected from the online survey, which gathered text-based opinions from 209 participants on the cost-benefit aspects of circularity strategies. The structured survey, which collected data from 43 workshop participants, evaluated the perceived importance of CE strategies across various BLC phases and assessed the adoption of selected CE strategies in current or past projects. Finally, the Six Thinking Hats® activity, employed in the round table discussions, generated ideas from 25 professionals regarding the broader implementation challenges and opportunities of CE in construction. The research findings highlight the need to bridge the gap between theory and practice by fostering active industry stakeholder involvement in the transition to a CE model. The analyses of the collected stakeholder opinions through the three activities contribute to proactive and collaborative efforts aimed at advancing resource equity in the construction sector and promoting just and inclusive resource use. In summary, this research offers a comprehensive understanding of stakeholders’ opinions on CE strategies and provides guidance for the development of targeted policies and strategies to accelerate the integration of CE principles in the construction industry.

show abstract

Section: Sentiment Analysis For Countriesmentioning

confidence: 76%

“…Most practices are relatively new, with countable examples of best practices, and there has not yet been sufficient time to prove their efficiency and effectiveness in the long term. In contrast, the study by De Lima et al [36] reported a • Topic 0-Barriers-The scope of this topic delves into the examination of 'barriers', encompassing the study of difficulties that impede progress towards the realisation of CE. The findings underscore the recognition by stakeholders of the challenges that arise when transitioning from a linear to a circular model.…”

Section: Sentiment Analysis For Countriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Stakeholders' Opinions On Ce Implication For Life Cycle Stagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cultivating Sustainable Construction: Stakeholder Insights Driving Circular Economy Innovation for Inclusive Resource Equity

Karaca,

Tleuken,

Pineda-Martos

et al. 2024

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Analysis of the possibility of reuse and recycling of construction waste at the stage of creation of a building information model

Serova

2024

Construction and Architecture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article discusses the possibility of reusing and recycling construction waste in the early stages of building design. The use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) to solve problems of systematizing information about the possibility of reusing and recycling construction waste allows us to solve ecological problems of a construction project, including the issues of choosing ecological friendly and sustainable materials for the implementation of design solutions, as well as increasing the efficiency of construction waste management.

show abstract

Integration of BIM and design for deconstruction to improve circular economy of buildings

Cited by 2 publications

References 36 publications

Cultivating Sustainable Construction: Stakeholder Insights Driving Circular Economy Innovation for Inclusive Resource Equity

Cultivating Sustainable Construction: Stakeholder Insights Driving Circular Economy Innovation for Inclusive Resource Equity

Analysis of the possibility of reuse and recycling of construction waste at the stage of creation of a building information model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About