2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47987-2_84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of Automatic Tools for Displaying Interaction Data in Computer Environments for Distance Learning

Abstract: : Our research concerns distance learning (DL). We are interested with distributed collaborative learning. In this approach, it is important to have indicators permitting the appreciation of durability and the evolution of groups involved. We think that actors responsible for the organisation and the working of groups (tutor for each group and coordinator of the DL session for all groups and its progress in general) can from the types of interactions and their amounts, get revealing elements permitting them to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using these SNA models, on global communication tracks, we aim at developing a monitoring system (Mbala & al., 2002) according to Jermann & al. 's classification (2001) which distinguishes mirroring-, monitoring-and guidingsystems in CSCL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using these SNA models, on global communication tracks, we aim at developing a monitoring system (Mbala & al., 2002) according to Jermann & al. 's classification (2001) which distinguishes mirroring-, monitoring-and guidingsystems in CSCL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such a complex situation we suggest we give priority to monitoring and not to guiding systems, even if other works in progress in our research group reconsider a whole DLMS as a multi-agent architecture in order to sustain interactions [9]. We have to understand exactly what happened in the groups during such an experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…«Approach» that indicates if the activity is individual, collaborative or cooperative; «Context» that indicates, for example, that the activity takes place in either an industrial context or a school context; «Problem to solve» that can be used to index activities for an eventual retrieval; «Constraints» that can be technical, organizational, temporal, and so forth; «Result» that includes beneficiary, resolution rate, dissemination means and delays; «Date» that indicates the start and end dates of the activity (Mbala 2002); «Activity-type» that may be classified into debate, analysis, validation, etc.…”
Section: Ims-cld Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%