2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05710-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of a vertebral fracture identification service into a fracture liaison service: a quality improvement project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be done by developing a clinical decision tool to help the FLS team to identify which patients to refer for further assessment and treatment based on their risk of dying and the predicted benefit of attending an FLS. Such a tool has previously been developed by Ong et al [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be done by developing a clinical decision tool to help the FLS team to identify which patients to refer for further assessment and treatment based on their risk of dying and the predicted benefit of attending an FLS. Such a tool has previously been developed by Ong et al [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning has previously been applied to a number of other neurological diagnostic targets. Several models for detecting spine fractures on CT have been developed and continue to be integrated into clinical workflows 10–12. Models for identifying and classifying epidural hematomas in the brain on CT have also been developed 13–15.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several models for detecting spine fractures on CT have been developed and continue to be integrated into clinical workflows. [10][11][12] Models for identifying and classifying epidural hematomas in the brain on CT have also been developed. [13][14][15] However, to our knowledge, this is the first machine learning model that has been developed for detection of spinal epidural hematomas and abscesses on CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm showed an AUC of 0.94, making it highly effective in opportunistically identifying vertebral fractures in routine CT scans [19]. Ong et al evaluated the efficacy of a machine learning algorithm in identifying vertebral fractures from CT scans, revealing that the algorithm detected fractures in 19.1% of 4461 patients, outperforming hospital radiologists whose reports only mentioned 49% of these fractures [20]. Valentinitsch et al used a random forest classifier and 3D texture features for opportunistic osteoporosis screening in thoracolumbar spine multi-detector CT scans, demonstrating high discriminatory power (AUC = 0.88) and outperforming global vertebral bone mineral density (vBMD) alone in identifying vertebral fractures [28].…”
Section: Opportunistic Screening and Fracture Liaisonmentioning
confidence: 99%