2022
DOI: 10.1016/s1872-2067(21)63883-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of 2D layered CdS/WO3 S-scheme heterojunctions and metallic Ti3C2 MXene-based Ohmic junctions for effective photocatalytic H2 generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
168
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
6
168
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also features low cost, chemical stability and visible light response. [42][43][44][45] In general, oxide photocatalysts have a higher work function than sulde photocatalysts. [46][47][48] Owing to the work function difference, there would be electron transfer between ZnIn 2 S 4 and WO 3 , thus creating an IEF at their interfaces upon contact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also features low cost, chemical stability and visible light response. [42][43][44][45] In general, oxide photocatalysts have a higher work function than sulde photocatalysts. [46][47][48] Owing to the work function difference, there would be electron transfer between ZnIn 2 S 4 and WO 3 , thus creating an IEF at their interfaces upon contact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8c). 56,57 This result suggests that the E f of NiS is lower than that of Cd 0.5 Zn 0.5 S, inferring that a Schottky junction can be formed after the close contact between Cd 0.5 Zn 0.5 S and NiS. 58 The significant difference between W s (NiS) and W m (Cd 0.5 Zn 0.5 S) reveals the electrons transformation from Cd 0.5 Zn 0.5 S to NiS until setting up an equilibrium state between the E f (NiS) and E f (Cd 0.5 Zn 0.5 S) in NiS/Cd 0.5 Zn 0.5 S. Obviously, the electrons are mainly gathered at the NiS side of the interface, which is accompanied by the loss of electrons at the Cd 0.5 Zn 0.5 S side, further evidencing the redistribution of the electrons at the interface of the heterojunction with the metallic NiS acting as electron acceptors upon contact with Cd 0.5 Zn 0.5 S. 59 The schematic illustration of the overall photocatalytic reaction over NiS is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8c). 56,57 This result suggests that the E f of NiS is lower than that of Cd 0.5 Zn 0.5 S, inferring that a Schottky junction can be formed after the close contact between Cd 0.5 Zn 0.5 S and NiS. 58 The significant difference between W s (NiS) and W m (Cd 0.5 Zn 0.5 S) reveals the electrons transformation from Cd 0.5 Zn 0.5 S to NiS until setting up an equilibrium state between the E f (NiS) and E f (Cd 0.5 Zn 0.5 S) in NiS/Cd 0.5 Zn 0.5 S.…”
Section: Photocatalytic Mechanism Of Nis/cd 05 Zn 05 S Nanocompositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, Z-scheme heterojunction nanocomposites are of particular importance due to their ability to promote not only the charge separation, but also the redox capacity. In a typical Z-scheme heterojunction nanocomposite, due to the well matched band structure of the components, photo-generated electrons and holes with weak redox capacity recombine with each other, leaving the electrons at the more negative conduction band (CB) and the holes at the more positive valence band (VB) separated, which results in long-lived charge separation and improved redox capacity [22][23][24][25][26][27]. Compared with the Z-scheme systems with a shuttle redox mediator, the allsolid-state Z-scheme photocatalytic systems with two semiconductors in direct contact are much more attractive for efficient promotion of the charge separation since they can shorten the electron transfer path and avoid the undesired backward reactions caused by the redox couples [28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%