2011
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.20453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration managers' value‐capturing roles and acquisition performance

Abstract: Although the signifi cance of managing the acquisition process is acknowledged, little evidence exists as to the ways in which managerial action throughout this process impacts acquisition performance. In this article, the researchers draw attention to the central, yet largely neglected fi gure responsible for implementing mergers and acquisitions (M&A), namely "the integration manager. " Drawing from an extensive study of nine related, friendly acquisitions involving 166 interviews, the authors fi nd that int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
67
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Several research studies in the field of M&A have used the case study approach to address various issues that arise following acquisitions, such as the management roles of the acquired firm (Graebner, 2004), the seller's view of the acquisition process (Graebner and Eisenhardt, 2004), explorations of the dynamics of pre-acquisition employee reactions in the acquired firm (Teerikangas, 2012), knowledge transfer in M&As (Ranft and Lord, 2002,;Zou and Ghauri, 2008), trust in M&As (Stahl, Larsson, Kremershof, and Sitkin, 2011) and trust asymmetries in acquisitions of entrepreneurial firms (Graebner, 2009), cultural clashes in high-tech M&As (Drori, Wrzesnievski, and Ellis, 2011), and the implementation of post-acquisition integration approaches (Monin, Noorderhaven, Vaara, and Kroon, 2012;Schweizer, 2006;Teerikangas, Very, and Pisano, 2011). Consistent with earlier research and owing to the interpretive nature of the study, we adopted an in-depth case study together with semi-structured interviews.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research studies in the field of M&A have used the case study approach to address various issues that arise following acquisitions, such as the management roles of the acquired firm (Graebner, 2004), the seller's view of the acquisition process (Graebner and Eisenhardt, 2004), explorations of the dynamics of pre-acquisition employee reactions in the acquired firm (Teerikangas, 2012), knowledge transfer in M&As (Ranft and Lord, 2002,;Zou and Ghauri, 2008), trust in M&As (Stahl, Larsson, Kremershof, and Sitkin, 2011) and trust asymmetries in acquisitions of entrepreneurial firms (Graebner, 2009), cultural clashes in high-tech M&As (Drori, Wrzesnievski, and Ellis, 2011), and the implementation of post-acquisition integration approaches (Monin, Noorderhaven, Vaara, and Kroon, 2012;Schweizer, 2006;Teerikangas, Very, and Pisano, 2011). Consistent with earlier research and owing to the interpretive nature of the study, we adopted an in-depth case study together with semi-structured interviews.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed approach can appropriately address a locally contextualised situation (Miles and Huberman, 1994; Schwiezer, 2005). Following Siggelkow's (2007) recommendation that cases need to respond with particular questions and conditions, the AE-SME case demonstrates value because it offers insights into HR dynamics and a rare instance of seeing developed economy SME talent management in an emerging economy partnership (Schweizer, 2006;Riad, S., and Vaara, E. 2011;Teerikangas, Very, and Pisano, 2011;Vaara, E. and Tienari, J. 2011;Riad, Vaara and Zhang 2012).…”
Section: Research Methodology and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst most studies provide evidence supporting the argument that organisational justice is a key success factor in acquisition management, Meyer and Altenborg (2007) argue that the principle of equality embedded in the concept of organisational justice has a negative influence in M&A social integration. Independently of the positive or negative of effect of organisational justice, evidence suggests that the reasons behind corporate failure in crossborder acquisitions are increasingly directed towards the 'human factor' (Cartwright & Cooper, 1992;Stahl et al, 2013;Teerikangas & Very, 2006;Teerikangas, Véry, & Pisano, 2011;Weber & Fried, 2011b). The literature surrounding M&A activity is increasingly attempting to link this human dimension to perceptions of organisational justice and organisational commitment.…”
Section: Background Literature and Hypotheses Development Imentioning
confidence: 99%