2016 International Conference on Information &Amp; Communication Technology and Systems (ICTS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icts.2016.7910276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration GLCM and geometric feature extraction of region of interest for classifying tuna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The texture feature extraction process will be calculated based on the image's neighboring value from the center point. Among the number of neighbors 1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128. So the resulting value on texture feature extraction as much as 256 bins (space) for texture features.…”
Section: B Texture Extraction Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The texture feature extraction process will be calculated based on the image's neighboring value from the center point. Among the number of neighbors 1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128. So the resulting value on texture feature extraction as much as 256 bins (space) for texture features.…”
Section: B Texture Extraction Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of the proposed method is to provide better performance in accuracy and complexity than other operators. In the other image processing research is the detection of tuna based on texture and its shape using gray level co-occurrences matrix (GLCM) [2]. This method adds geometric feature extraction of the region of interest (ROI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of performance, the comparison of the performance of the Surf, Harris, Brisk, and Fask feature extraction methods shows that the Surf method is the best in classifying images [14]. Furthermore, from the integration of the GLCM feature extraction method and geometric feature extraction of a region of interest (ROI) for classifying tuna, it was found that the best classification accuracy was 86.76% obtained through the GLCM method [15]. In addition, the use of the HSV color feature extraction method and GLCM texture feature extraction to identify the type of woven fabric shows that the accuracy of the color and texture combination features is 91.67% [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in the field of the image is widely used in various areas, for example, facial recognition using ESLGS (Extended Symmetric Local Graph Structure) method is an improvement over the previous method of SLGS [1]. Face recognition accuracy using the ESLGS method obtained an accuracy of 84.24%, compared with the previous method of SLGS of 80.59%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%