2014 12th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/indin.2014.6945504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating UML, MARTE and sysml to improve requirements specification and traceability in the embedded domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modeling languages that are part of MegaM@Rt2 framework (e.g., MARTE and SysML) are well-suited for modeling a variety of requirements at different levels (e.g. from component to system level), as shown by existing studies [31,32,33]. Some industrial use cases from the project have specific non-functional requirements to meet, for example explicit safety requirements of the train control management system for Bombardier Transportation, Sweden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modeling languages that are part of MegaM@Rt2 framework (e.g., MARTE and SysML) are well-suited for modeling a variety of requirements at different levels (e.g. from component to system level), as shown by existing studies [31,32,33]. Some industrial use cases from the project have specific non-functional requirements to meet, for example explicit safety requirements of the train control management system for Bombardier Transportation, Sweden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UML and its SYSML/MARTE profiles are frequently used in different combinations to specify structural and behavior aspects because it is challenging to specify the complete requirements for complex systems through a single profile individually. On the other hand, there are certain issues while integrating UML and its SYSML/MARTE profiles (Espinoza et al, 2009;Rota Sena Marques et al, 2014). Another big challenge is to select the appropriate property specification approach while specifying various properties and constraints in the models.…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, each selected research is intensively studied and Di et al, 2013, Berrani et al, 2013, Stancescu et al, 2010, Ouchani et al, 2013, Bouquet et al, 2012, DeTommasi et al, 2013, Andrade et al, 2009, Bazydlo et al, 2014, Doligalski and Adamski, 2013, Mueller et al, 2010, Durand and Bonato, 2012, Moreira et al, 2010, Vidal et al, 2009, Linehan and Clarke, 2012, Herrera et al, 2014, Lecomte et al, 2011, Rafiq Quadri et al, 2012, Chen et al, 2013, Vanderperren et al, 2008, Elhaji et al, 2012, Riccobene and Scandurra, 2012Zohaib Iqbal et al, 2013, Chouali and Hammad, 2011, Doering, 2014, Ouchani et al, 2014, Telinski Wiedermann anger et al, 2013, Knorreck and Apvrille, 2011, Ge et al, 2012, Baresi et al, 2013, Huang et al, 2012, Nguyen et al, 2014, Bousse et al, 2012 Modeling 5 Gomez et al, 2012, Penil et al, 2010, Espinoza et al, 2009, Rota Sena Marques et al, 2014, Behjati et al, 2011 Property specification 2 Yin et al, 2013, Mallet, 2012 Model transformation 11 Gre...…”
Section: Data Extraction and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors describe the definition of each vision without presenting, accurately, which MARTE elements were employed. In [15], the authors present an approach suitable for describing the processes of engineering requirements by using in conjunction UML Use Case diagrams, UML Class diagrams, UML Sequence diagrams, SysML Requirements diagram and the MARTE profile. The authors proposed an approach entitled MDEReq (Model Driven Engineering for Requirement Management) for requirements specification and change management.…”
Section: Background On Real-time Modeling and Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%