Integrating the environmental and social sustainability pillars into the lean and agile supply chain management paradigms: A literature review and future research directions

Abstract

Established supply chain management paradigms such as leanness, agility, and sustainability have received increased attention in the literature, but mainly as separate topics. However, while the importance of sustainability as a competitive priority has grown significantly in recent years, companies still try to reconcile the pressures of enhancing their supply chain efficiency and effectiveness. Thus, understanding what is the best way for companies to design and implement a system of practices that meets, on the one hand, the environmental and social requirements of a wide set of stakeholders and, on the other hand, the need to be lean (efficient and waste free) and/or agile (fast and flexible to the needs of the market place) is critical. Our paper develops a systematic literature review addressing the integration of lean, agile and sustainable supply chain management paradigms. 73 papers are analysed, deriving 6 types of integration between lean & sustainable and agile & sustainable supply chain paradigms. To achieve each type of integration, a set of practices are highlighted. Interestingly, the same practices can support different integration types. The paper discusses possible reasons behind these differences and provides future research directions. We suggest further studies should be devoted to investigating the agile e sustainable paradigms integration more in depth as well as the effect of including social dimension when considering the integration between established and sustainable supply chain paradigms. Moreover, we address the lack of empirical studies and the need to take an evolutionary perspective when looking at the integration. Finally, we suggest developing conceptual and empirical studies on whether and how integration between paradigms is contingent upon the strategic relevance of sustainability.

Decent Work as Determinant of Work Engagement on Dependent Self-Employed

“…This circumstance, together with the development of social awareness regarding human rights and the protection of the environment, has led to a growing interest in sustainability [3]. This is manifested in the proliferation of academic studies on sustainability in different fields of knowledge, such as economy (e.g., [4,5]), management (e.g., [6,7]), sociology (e.g., [8,9]), etc. International organizations such as the United Nations (UN) show also an increasing concern for sustainability.…”

A Systematic Literature Review for Better Understanding of Lean Driven Sustainability

“…TPM is another lean tool that was linked with solutions to some economic, environmental, and social sustainability issues [8,101,225,226]. TPM was often referred as one of the most effective waste elimination tools [142,151,249]. In a past study, TPM was shown to be among ten lean tools that simultaneously help with productivity and environmental efficiency [4].…”

“…The authors supported their claim with outcomes of a case study for aerospace industry. In the most recently published review article, Ciccullo et al, (2018) have evaluated lean-sustainability and agile-sustainability integration under six categories to identify the characteristics of integration within the scope of supply chain performance [142]. They found that the most common characteristic of lean or agile integration with sustainability was as a supporting paradigm followed by their integration characteristic as a precursor to sustainability.…”

Climate Change Mitigation: Application of Management Production Philosophies for Energy Saving in Industrial Processes

“…The research explores the challenges facing organizations in aligning sustainable procurement requirements and the attendant shifts in supply chain management practices (green practices). [46,50,51]…”