2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating terrestrial laser scanning and unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry to estimate individual tree attributes in managed coniferous forests in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stem volume has been found to be estimated with an RMSE of approximately 10% in sparser plots using TLS, with the estimates being as accurate as using the best national allometric model available [6]. The combination of TLS and above-canopy laser scanning has also been studied and suggested to be an optimal method for collecting data on individual trees [7,32,[43][44][45][46][47]. This approach can utilize the detailed point cloud data of treetops from the above-canopy laser scanning and the detailed point cloud data of tree stems from the TLS platform.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stem volume has been found to be estimated with an RMSE of approximately 10% in sparser plots using TLS, with the estimates being as accurate as using the best national allometric model available [6]. The combination of TLS and above-canopy laser scanning has also been studied and suggested to be an optimal method for collecting data on individual trees [7,32,[43][44][45][46][47]. This approach can utilize the detailed point cloud data of treetops from the above-canopy laser scanning and the detailed point cloud data of tree stems from the TLS platform.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key message from this previous work was the need to acquire data from multiple perspectives due to tree stems' irregular, uneven shapes [6,7]. High site densities and significant understory vegetation have also been found to contribute to errors in estimated DBH values [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike UAV-LiDAR, backpack-LiDAR uses a bottom-up data acquisition method, which is well suited for the estimation of parameters such as diameter at breast height and branch height, as it can record the under-canopy characteristics of trees and present them as a high-density point cloud [30]. However, due to the mutual occlusion of the canopy, it is difficult for the laser pulses to effectively penetrate the canopy and thus capture information from the treetops, which leads to a biased estimation of tree height by the backpack LiDAR [31]. In view of the shortcomings of single-platform LiDAR in parameter estimation, many scholars have tried to combine multi-platform LiDAR systems to overcome the above limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%