2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating spatially explicit molecular and ecological methods to explore the significance of non-crop vegetation to predators of brassica pests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Social wasps did not respond to pesticide usage, suggesting that wasp communities inside forest remnants may serve as a permanent reservoir for wasps found in adjacent coffee plantations, allowing rapid recolonization of crops after disturbance such as pesticide applications and nest removal by farmers. Indeed, monocultures often fail to provide a constant supply of resources for beneficial insects, leading biological control agents to rely heavily on adjacent non-crop habitats to obtain their ecological needs and recolonize adjacent crop matrix after disturbances (Heimoana et al 2017). Table 3 Significant models to explain the species richness and abundance of social wasps, pest occurrence, and natural pest control in 16 coffee-producing landscapes in Southern Brazil in the dry and wet seasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social wasps did not respond to pesticide usage, suggesting that wasp communities inside forest remnants may serve as a permanent reservoir for wasps found in adjacent coffee plantations, allowing rapid recolonization of crops after disturbance such as pesticide applications and nest removal by farmers. Indeed, monocultures often fail to provide a constant supply of resources for beneficial insects, leading biological control agents to rely heavily on adjacent non-crop habitats to obtain their ecological needs and recolonize adjacent crop matrix after disturbances (Heimoana et al 2017). Table 3 Significant models to explain the species richness and abundance of social wasps, pest occurrence, and natural pest control in 16 coffee-producing landscapes in Southern Brazil in the dry and wet seasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural enemy populations are negatively affected by frequent and intense human disturbance from harvest, tillage and pesticide use that characterize intensive agriculture 2,4 . Remnant non-crop habitats such as ground cover or wild plants can provide shelter, being a source habitat from which natural enemies can colonize crops 1,5 . The reintroduction of appropriate flowering plants into monocultures can promote longevity, fecundity, sex ratio and searching capacity of natural enemies such as parasitoids [6][7][8][9] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, six sprays per crop could not control DBM even though Diadegma persisted. This strongly suggests that DBM is an induced pest and potentially manageable if conditions can be improved for natural enemies, as has often been suggested (Furlong et al , 2004 a , b , 2008; Schellhorn et al , 2008 b ; Heimoana et al , 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%