2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2016.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating social power into the decision-making of cognitive agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…for social norms could significantly hinder AI systems' ability to interact with humans (Pereira et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for social norms could significantly hinder AI systems' ability to interact with humans (Pereira et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although survey of the literature of social power shows many definitions of the concept; this does not suggest that all definitions are valid in all social contexts (Dowding, 2012). This is because power is a social construct that may be determined by clearly assigned and explicitly defined roles of a particular society (Pereira et al, 2016). This paper identifies three gaps in the study of social power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Review of literature of power shows that the concept has different meanings (Pereira et al, 2016). Multiple meanings challenge the use of a single definition of power in different social contexts (Pansardi, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of self-regulation can be explained from the third side -from the standpoint of the theory of systems, if we involve the system principle of non-equilibrium state in the analysis [20][21][22]. According to the latter, the system is in a dynamically non-equilibrium state if the equality between two oppositely directed forces of the system is violated:…”
Section: Analysis Of Dynamic Behavior Model Of the Mea From The Standmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained triad of theories that form the mathematical basis for describing the behavior of the MEA, is a reflection of the triad of approaches that form the basis of the concept of research and modeling of MES. The concept is based on the integration of approaches: system, dynamic (embodied in the theory of management), as well as cognitive and scenario, reflected in the economic theory [17,[19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Analysis Of Dynamic Behavior Model Of the Mea From The Standmentioning
confidence: 99%