2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating social and facial models of person perception: Converging and diverging dimensions

Abstract: Models of first impressions from faces have consistently found two underlying dimensions of trustworthiness and dominance. These dimensions show apparent parallels to social psychological models of inter-group perception that describe dimensions of warmth (cf. trustworthiness) and competence (cf. dominance), and it has been suggested that they reflect universal dimensions of social cognition. We investigated whether the dimensions from face and inter-group social perception models are indeed equivalent by eval… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
106
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(90 reference statements)
16
106
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with previous studies from which our model of facial first impressions was derived (e.g., Sutherland et al, 2013Sutherland et al, , 2016, all of the analyses we report involve the underlying structure of facial impressions. To achieve this, we use the averaged responses to each of the 1,000 face images as the primary data, rather than individual participants' responses (cf.…”
Section: Research Overviewsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In line with previous studies from which our model of facial first impressions was derived (e.g., Sutherland et al, 2013Sutherland et al, , 2016, all of the analyses we report involve the underlying structure of facial impressions. To achieve this, we use the averaged responses to each of the 1,000 face images as the primary data, rather than individual participants' responses (cf.…”
Section: Research Overviewsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Oosterhof and Todorov (2008) suggested that these factors might be important because together they signal threat: An untrustworthy and dominant face represents someone who is best avoided, whilst a trustworthy-looking person may be a friendly ally. This two-factor solution bears striking resemblance to other models of person perception (Rosenberg, Nelson, & Vivekananthan, 1968;Wiggins, 1979), including the stereotype content model's dimension of warmth and competence (Fiske, Cuddy, & Glick, 2007;Walker & Vetter, 2016; but see Sutherland et al, 2016). This two-factor solution bears striking resemblance to other models of person perception (Rosenberg, Nelson, & Vivekananthan, 1968;Wiggins, 1979), including the stereotype content model's dimension of warmth and competence (Fiske, Cuddy, & Glick, 2007;Walker & Vetter, 2016; but see Sutherland et al, 2016).…”
Section: Facial First Impressionsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to other implementations, such as photo averaging (reviewed in Sutherland, Oldmeadow, & Young, 2016) or those using computer-generated faces (reviewed in Jack & Schyns, 2017;Todorov et al, 2011), the noise-based implementation places the least constraints on the stimulus set. This allows the most freedom for features to appear in the CI that researchers did not deem relevant a priori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, additional trait ratings for all 39 models of the RaFD's Caucasian Adult Subset (neutral expression, frontal gaze) are presented. The models were rated on nine trait dimensions (Oosterhof & Todorov, 2008;Sutherland et al, 2013;Sutherland, Oldmeadow, & Young, 2016): trustworthiness, dominance, attractiveness, competence, openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and emotional stability. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%