2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2017.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Remotely Sensed Imagery and Existing Multiscale Field Data to Derive Rangeland Indicators: Application of Bayesian Additive Regression Trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The errors are equivalent or lower than RMSEs from similar efforts to map continuous rangeland cover, where McCord et al. () used a Bayesian additive regression tree and reported RMSEs ranging from 11% to 14% for BG, herbaceous, and shrub classes, and Xian et al. () used regression tree modeling and reported errors ranging from 9.7% to 14.4% for AFG, SHR, and BG classes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The errors are equivalent or lower than RMSEs from similar efforts to map continuous rangeland cover, where McCord et al. () used a Bayesian additive regression tree and reported RMSEs ranging from 11% to 14% for BG, herbaceous, and shrub classes, and Xian et al. () used regression tree modeling and reported errors ranging from 9.7% to 14.4% for AFG, SHR, and BG classes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Examination of errors between the ranger and EE RF model implementations showed minimal disparity with no error difference greater than 0.5% between the two implementations. The errors are equivalent or lower than RMSEs from similar efforts to map continuous rangeland cover, where McCord et al (2017) used a Bayesian additive regression tree and reported RMSEs ranging from 11% to 14% for BG, herbaceous, and shrub classes, and Xian et al (2013) used regression tree modeling and reported errors ranging from 9.7% to 14.4% for AFG, SHR, and BG classes.…”
Section: Validation and Error Metricsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Representative networks inform more comprehensively on long term change over large areas without bias to particular systems. They have been implemented effectively to provide spatial surveys of above-and belowground biodiversity (Bastin et al 2017;Lemetre et al 2017;Baruch et al 2018), and to monitor ecosystem condition in relation to disturbance, land use and climate change (Hoekman et al, 2017;McCord et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%