2014
DOI: 10.5075/epfl-thesis-6302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Rate Based Models into a Multi-Objective Process Design & Optimisation Framework using Surrogate Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternately, machine learning methods can be used to train surrogates such as polynomial regression models (Wang et al, 2018), artificial neural networks (ANNs) (Teske, 2014;Miriyala et al, 2016;Kotidis and Kontoravdi, 2020), or distribution models (Hutter et al, 2021) to emulate the behavior of MK models. For example, Wang et al (2018) correlated combustion reaction data at different operating conditions using neural network surrogate models.…”
Section: Machine Learning Emulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternately, machine learning methods can be used to train surrogates such as polynomial regression models (Wang et al, 2018), artificial neural networks (ANNs) (Teske, 2014;Miriyala et al, 2016;Kotidis and Kontoravdi, 2020), or distribution models (Hutter et al, 2021) to emulate the behavior of MK models. For example, Wang et al (2018) correlated combustion reaction data at different operating conditions using neural network surrogate models.…”
Section: Machine Learning Emulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these strategies have yet to be demonstrated on complex reaction networks such as oligomerization that consider O(10 3 ) elementary reaction steps and multiple products. Machine learning approaches (Teske, 2014;Miriyala et al, 2016;Kotidis and Kontoravdi, 2020), on the other hand, use simulations or experimental data libraries to train neural networks and similar surrogate models to predict the reactor effluent. Although these approaches are not restricted by the MK model size, they require large amounts of data to train and lack the ability to emulate kinetic or thermodynamic behavior outside the range of validation (Miriyala et al, 2016) which can be problematic for reactor optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%