2019
DOI: 10.1101/609149
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Protein Localization with Automated Signaling Pathway Reconstruction

Abstract: Understanding cellular responses via signal transduction is a core focus in systems biology. Tools to automatically reconstruct signaling pathways from protein-protein interactions (PPIs) can help biologists generate testable hypotheses about signaling. However, automatic reconstruction of signaling pathways suffers from many interactions with the same confidence score leading to many equally good candidates. Further, some reconstructions are biologically misleading due to ignoring protein localization informa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our distance metric focuses only on topology and does not include any information about the biological context. ResponseNet (Basha et al, 2019) and PathLinker (Youssef et al, 2018) extensions consider tissue-specificity and protein localization context, respectively. A possible extension of pathway parameter advising would be to account for this information, such as adding a penalty for interactions that occur in different tissues or cellular compartments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our distance metric focuses only on topology and does not include any information about the biological context. ResponseNet (Basha et al, 2019) and PathLinker (Youssef et al, 2018) extensions consider tissue-specificity and protein localization context, respectively. A possible extension of pathway parameter advising would be to account for this information, such as adding a penalty for interactions that occur in different tissues or cellular compartments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein-protein interactions can be modeled as graphs where the nodes stand in for proteins and the edges represent a (possibly directed) interaction between two proteins. These graphs, called interactomes, can be built from experimental dataset repositories and can be weighted by confidence in the interaction, functional relationship, or tissue [16,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Interactomes provide a background set of plausible interactions for consideration in a pathway of interest, and network-based methods generally have been successful with amplifying the signal of interacting proteins [25].…”
Section: Network-based Pathway Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactome: We use PLNET 2 , a weighted, directed interactome constructed from both molecular interaction data and signaling pathway databases (including the database used for ground truth pathways) [16]. PLNET 2 is weighted using an evidence-based Bayesian method introduced by RN [9] that assigns a high confidence to edges supported by experimental methods that successfully predict signaling interactions [16]. PLNET 2 contains 17, 168 nodes (UniProtKB identifiers [27]) and 612, 516 directed edges, including 286, 520 physical interactions that are converted to bidirected edges.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of these approaches generate new predictions by integrating protein-protein interaction data with gene [7,12,21,21,29,30,33] or protein [4,15,19,24] expression. Other approaches work to remove biologically implausible predictions [20,34]. Here, we will focus on methods that use protein-protein interaction data to predict new proteins and molecular interactions involved in canonical signaling pathways.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%