1995
DOI: 10.1108/01443579510083631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating production activity control into a hierarchical production‐planning model

Abstract: Presents a hierarchical production planning (HPP) model that integrates aggregate‐type planning, family disaggregate planning, lot‐sizing, job scheduling and evaluation of the final production plans into a complete planning and scheduling system. In‐corporation of a simple heuristic scheduling algorithm into the HPP model is the primary contribution. The scheduling routine schedules the jobs based on just‐in‐time (JIT) concept and provides detailed shopfloor information such as job tardiness, bottleneck work c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By using the multiple regression, it has been shown that more efficient operational planning has better impact on effectiveness of the production process. On the other hand, the results of previous research have shown that better elaboration and production planning development, affects the increase of productivity and capacity utilisation; lowers the fallout ratio (Meybodi, 1995;Wacker & Sheu, 2006) and affects the compliance with the terms of delivery (Chen & Cochran, 2005;Mohamed & Bernardo, 1997). The only exception is the stock turnover coefficient, since the results of this article contradict the results of the research by Raman et al (2008).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By using the multiple regression, it has been shown that more efficient operational planning has better impact on effectiveness of the production process. On the other hand, the results of previous research have shown that better elaboration and production planning development, affects the increase of productivity and capacity utilisation; lowers the fallout ratio (Meybodi, 1995;Wacker & Sheu, 2006) and affects the compliance with the terms of delivery (Chen & Cochran, 2005;Mohamed & Bernardo, 1997). The only exception is the stock turnover coefficient, since the results of this article contradict the results of the research by Raman et al (2008).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Furthermore, in 1995, Meybodi (Meybodi, 1995) conducted the research in which the outcomes of the existent Hierarchical Planning Production (HPP) model (aggregate planning, disaggregated group decision planning, termination, evaluation of the production plan) were compared by using linear programming aiming at minimisation of costs: stock declaration, replacement of materials, subcontracting and labour force. The success ratio was measured by capacity utilisation and general business costs indexes.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%