Integrating Problem Solvers from Analogous Markets in New Product Ideation

Abstract

W ho provides better inputs to new product ideation tasks, problem solvers with expertise in the area for which new products are to be developed or problem solvers from "analogous" markets that are distant but share an analogous problem or need? Conventional wisdom appears to suggest that target market expertise is indispensable, which is why most managers searching for new ideas tend to stay within their own market context even when they do search outside their firms' boundaries. However, in a unique symmetric experiment that isolates the effect of market origin, we find evidence for the opposite: Although solutions provided by problem solvers from analogous markets show lower potential for immediate use, they demonstrate substantially higher levels of novelty. Also, compared to established novelty drivers, this effect appears highly relevant from a managerial perspective: we find that including problem solvers from analogous markets versus the target market accounts for almost two-thirds of the well-known effect of involving lead users instead of average problem solvers. This effect is further amplified when the analogous distance between the markets increases, i.e., when searching in far versus near analogous markets. Finally, results indicate that the analogous market effect is particularly strong in the upper tail of the novelty distribution, which again underscores the effect's practical importance. All of this suggests that it might pay to systematically search across firm-external sources of innovation that were formerly out of scope for most managers.Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx

Creating shareholder value via collaborative innovation: the role of industry and resource alignment in knowledge exploration

“…Moreover, while most attention so far has been focused on the innovation‐related outcomes of absorptive capacity (Volberda et al, ), our study explains the neglected but crucial links between absorptive capacity and shareholder value outcomes in collaborative innovation (Lane et al, ), especially in those aimed at explorative innovation (Stettner and Lavie, ). Finally, by exhibiting positive effects of industry distance on shareholder value outcomes, this study extends prior research on the innovation‐related outcome effects of industry distance (Datta and Jessup, ; Enkel and Gassmann, ; Li and Vanhaverbeke, ) and analogical distance (Kalogerakis et al, ; Franke et al, ; Horváth and Enkel, ).…”

Idea Rejected, Tie Formed: Organizations’ Feedback on Crowdsourced Ideas

“…Individual contributors from outside the organization can use these suggestion boxes to submit ideas for how the organization can innovate (Gambardella, Raasch & von Hippel, 2017). Crowdsourcing ideas allows organizations to tap into the widely dispersed knowledge of contributors (Afuah & Tucci, 2012;Baldwin & von Hippel, 2011;Franke, Poetz & Schreier, 2014;Jeppesen & Lakhani, 2010;Lakhani, Lifshitz-Assaf & Tushman, 2013;Lifshitz-Assaf, 2018).…”

Of clouds and zombies: How and when analogical learning improves evaluations of really new products

“…The choice of which domain should be used to communicate a novel benefit through an analogy is a key decision in the hands of marketing managers (Franke, Poetz, & Schreier, 2013). Therefore, in this research we focus on an aspect of potential base domains that may have an important impact on consumer learning, the analogy's domain proximity .…”