2022
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2022.875433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Potential Land Use Conflict Into Ecological Security Pattern in Response to Land Use/Cover Changes at a County Scale in Yangtze River Delta, China

Abstract: Identifying key ecological nodes/corridors and priority restoration areas (KENPRA) is the key link for optimizing land use and ecological security patterns (ESPs). However, few studies have considered future land use/cover change (LUCC) and urban sprawl in identifying KENPRA for ESP maintenance. To optimize KENPRA, we took Quanjiao County, Anhui Province, China as a case study area, a typical unit for Chinese Land Spatial Planning and a suburb of Yangtze River Delta agglomeration challenging LUCC and ecologica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, the spatial simulation results showed that the construction land was expanded on a large scale in the built‐up areas, while in other areas it was a decentralized dot‐like expansion, and that there was a significant spatial autocorrelation in the transformation of various types of land use, indicating that the change was not random. Large‐scale (Zhang, Wang, et al, 2020; Zhang, Zhou, & Song, 2020) and small‐scale (Peng et al, 2022) studies in other parts of China have confirmed this change in land use over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Subsequently, the spatial simulation results showed that the construction land was expanded on a large scale in the built‐up areas, while in other areas it was a decentralized dot‐like expansion, and that there was a significant spatial autocorrelation in the transformation of various types of land use, indicating that the change was not random. Large‐scale (Zhang, Wang, et al, 2020; Zhang, Zhou, & Song, 2020) and small‐scale (Peng et al, 2022) studies in other parts of China have confirmed this change in land use over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, in Figure 2, we mention that the spatial simulation of land‐use change is carried out under the constraints of the restriction map. Specifically, considering that the Qianshan assume important ecosystem functions in the regional context, land‐use changes are regulated by natural and policy factors, so we combined the ecological redline policy (Jiang et al, 2019; Peng et al, 2022) with the permanent basic farmland policy (Zhang & Wu, 2022) to form the restriction map applied in the PLUS model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ordos City is seriously threatened by desertification. Meanwhile, the growth of built-up land will have a detrimental effect on the natural environment Peng et al, 2022), and expanding croplands, which are semi-artificial environments, will also pose a threat to the ecosystem (Yang, 2021). Based on this, we set cropland, built-up land, and sandy land as threat sources.…”
Section: Quantification Of Essmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ecosystem is an essential basis for human survival and development, which is also a support system of human life. It is the primary part of the regional ecological pattern, which connects isolated landscape patches by ecological corridors (Jiao et al, 2021;Peng et al, 2022). This system combines with point, line, and surface to improve the self-discipline of the landscape and maintain regional ecological surrounding stability (Fan and Myint, 2014;Liang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%