2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2006.00245.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating policy and science in natural resources: Why so difficult?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
72
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ineffective communication of science represents one of the key barriers preventing the integration of science into the decision-making process (Policansky 1998, Weber andWord 2001), with cultural differences between scientists and decision makers identified as one of the key underlying causes (e.g., Pouyat 1999, Briggs 2006, Roux et al 2006. Communication, however, represents an even greater challenge for issues such as climate change, which attracts significant public attention, resulting in most individuals already possessing strong perceptions and beliefs making them highly susceptible to biases (Kahan et al 2012, Leviston andWalker 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ineffective communication of science represents one of the key barriers preventing the integration of science into the decision-making process (Policansky 1998, Weber andWord 2001), with cultural differences between scientists and decision makers identified as one of the key underlying causes (e.g., Pouyat 1999, Briggs 2006, Roux et al 2006. Communication, however, represents an even greater challenge for issues such as climate change, which attracts significant public attention, resulting in most individuals already possessing strong perceptions and beliefs making them highly susceptible to biases (Kahan et al 2012, Leviston andWalker 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the effective translation of scientific-research findings into policy and on-ground practice is still limited. Obstacles to integration and partnerships among these disparate groups are well known and may result from the fundamentally different approaches that scientists and those engaged in the policy process take to scientific knowledge (Briggs 2006;Rogers 2006;Pielke 2007;Hart and Calhoun 2010). Effective catchment management incorporating lessons from the past could be progressively improved by the a priori establishment and maintenance of integrative research projects that provide the conduit for greater awareness, involvement, transparency and understanding among research, policy and management communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While scientists, managers and policy officers are often criticised for their lack of interaction with one another (Kingsford 2007;Briggs 2006;Roux et al 2006), threatened species conservation will only succeed when there is good communication between all three groups of experts. Being able to foster scientific research through the allocation of funding and then use the information gained to direct conservation management is particularly rewarding.…”
Section: The Goodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary requirement of policy work is to be able to analyse a problem and negotiate a solution that is scientifically sound and acceptable to stakeholders. Briggs (2006) critiques the roles of policy officers and scientists, challenging both professions to understand and appreciate the different niche each occupies within the conservation arena.…”
Section: The Life Of a Threatened Species Officer Catherine Pricementioning
confidence: 99%