2022
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2022.2119899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating peer feedback and instructor feedback to support the construction of bilingual scientific argument maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be specific, our results indicate that undergraduates who attended monolingual schools at secondary level and those students who attended bilingual or trilingual schools can study together in the same bilingual course without sacrificing their academic performance. Archila et al (2022aArchila et al ( , 2022bArchila et al ( , 2022c) also came to the same conclusion after having compared the grades obtained in quizzes and exams in a university bilingual science course by undergraduates who attended monolingual, bilingual or trilingual schools at secondary level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To be specific, our results indicate that undergraduates who attended monolingual schools at secondary level and those students who attended bilingual or trilingual schools can study together in the same bilingual course without sacrificing their academic performance. Archila et al (2022aArchila et al ( , 2022bArchila et al ( , 2022c) also came to the same conclusion after having compared the grades obtained in quizzes and exams in a university bilingual science course by undergraduates who attended monolingual, bilingual or trilingual schools at secondary level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In contexts where students with high, middle, and low levels of English language proficiency study together, it is fundamental to understand how differences in language and literacy skills may influence academic achievement (Archila et al, 2022a(Archila et al, , 2022b(Archila et al, , 2022c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation